Background Increasing evidence indicates that antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive conversion occurs in patients initially diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and as a result, some of these patients develop microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). However, the incidence density of these patients is not well known.
Objectives To explore the incidence of ANCA-positive conversion and development of MPA during the disease course in patients with IPF and to evaluate whether corticosteroid therapy reduces MPA development in patients with IPF with myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA positivity at diagnosis or who later acquire MPO-ANCA positivity.
Methods We retrospectively analysed the medical records of 504 Asian patients with IPF treated at our institution in Saitama, Japan.
Results Of the 504 patients with IPF, 20 (4.0%) had MPO-ANCA and 16 (3.2%) had PR-3-ANCA when first evaluated. In 264 of 504 patients with IPF, ANCA was measured repeatedly and seroconversion to MPO-ANCA and PR3-ANCA occurred in 15 (5.7%) and 14 (5.3%) patients, respectively, and 9 of 35 patients who were either MPO-ANCA positive at IPF diagnosis or who subsequently seroconverted developed MPA. None of the nine patients who developed MPA had been previously treated with steroids. The incidence of MPA tended to be lower in patients treated than not treated with corticosteroids although this was not statistically significant.
Conclusions Some patients with IPF with MPO-ANCA positivity at IPF diagnosis or with MPO-ANCA-positive conversion during follow-up developed MPA. Clinical trials to determine whether corticosteroid therapy can reduce MPA development and prolong survival in MPO-ANCA-positive patients with IPF should be considered.
- ANCA Related Vasculitides
- Interstitial Fibrosis
- Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive conversion occurs in patients initially diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and as a result, some of these patients develop microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). However, the incidence density of these patients is not well known.
Some patients with MPO-ANCA positivity at IPF diagnosis or with MPO-ANCA-positive conversion during follow-up developed MPA.
The incidence of MPA tended to be lower in patients treated than not treated with corticosteroids although this was not statistically significant.
Vasculitides associated with serum positivity for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) are commonly recognised as ANCA-associated vasculitis.1 ,2 ANCAs directed against proteinase 3 (PR3) are detected mainly in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis, whereas ANCAs directed against myeloperoxidase (MPO) are found predominantly in patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.3 Prevalences of MPO-ANCA and PR3-ANCA positivity in patients with MPA are reported to be 30–80% and 10–30%, respectively.4 MPA with pulmonary involvement is seen in up to 30% of patients5 in whom diffuse alveolar haemorrhage with pathological capillaritis is the most common manifestation.
Nada et al6 reported three patients initially diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who developed pulmonary-renal vasculitis. An association between MPA and pulmonary fibrosis has since been demonstrated.7–25 There sometimes appears to be an association between MPO-ANCA, MPA and pulmonary fibrosis.15 ,26 Pulmonary fibrosis associated with MPO-ANCA or MPA is either idiopathic or associated with connective tissue disease,27 and the most frequent histological or radiological pattern is that of usual interstitial pneumonia.15–17 ,22–27 MPO-ANCA-positive IPF is recognised as a distinct phenotype of IPF.28
At least two possibilities have been proposed for the development of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with MPO-ANCA or MPA: repeated episodes of alveolar haemorrhage due to pulmonary capillaritis could be the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis,10 and MPO-ANCAs may play a direct role in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis.16 ,29 A third hypothesis, proposed by Tzelepis et al,17 states that because pulmonary fibrosis is clinically manifest at MPA diagnosis, the possibility of IPF inducing MPA cannot be entirely excluded. Thereafter, Ando et al23 reported that during the disease course of 61 patients with IPF, MPO-ANCA positive conversion occurred in 6 patients, of whom 2 were complicated by MPA. This implies that some ANCA-negative patients with IPF acquire ANCA positivity and then develop MPA. Taken together, these findings imply that pulmonary fibrosis is not only a consequence of MPA or of a direct role of MPO-ANCA but also that it may induce ANCA and MPA.
We thus thought that the prevalence of MPO-ANCA or PR3-ANCA positivity at IPF diagnosis and the incidence density of MPO-ANCA or PR3-ANCA-positive conversion and MPA development during follow-up should be elucidated on a large scale. Therefore, we investigated risk factors of ANCA-positive conversion and whether ANCA positivity at IPF diagnosis was associated with mortality, and evaluated whether corticosteroid therapy reduces MPA development and prolongs survival in patients with IPF with MPO-ANCA positivity at diagnosis or who later acquire MPO-ANCA positivity.
From 1998 through 2012, 966 patients with IPF were treated at our institution (figure 1). Of these patients, 462 were excluded: 10 patients with MPA at IPF diagnosis, 21 with exacerbation of IPF at diagnosis, 248 with simultaneous lung cancer, 39 with simultaneous chronic pulmonary infections and 144 patients in whom ANCA measurement was unavailable. Patients with IPF and lung cancer or chronic pulmonary infections were not included as these conditions can be associated with ANCA positivity.30 Thus, 504 patients comprised the cohort of this study, and they were further divided into three cohorts according to ANCA positivity at IPF diagnosis whether ANCA had or had not been measured repeatedly (figure 1). Patients were followed up through August 2013 or until death. All patients fulfilled the criteria for IPF of the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society31 or the official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement on IPF.32 MPA was diagnosed using the Chapel Hill consensus criteria.1 This study was approved by the institutional review board of Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center.
This was a retrospective cohort study. Clinical, radiographic, laboratory data and outcome were collected from medical records. Baseline clinical parameters were obtained within 1 month of the initial diagnosis. If these data were not obtained within this period, we considered them to be unknown. Survival status was obtained from medical records and/or telephone interviews.
Measurement of ANCA
MPO-ANCAs and PR3-ANCAs were tested using an enzyme immunoassay: January 1998–August 1999 (NIPRO Japan), September 1999–March 2002 (BIO-RAD, USA), April 2002–March 2012 (Medical and Biological Laboratories, Japan) and April 2012 onward (Phadia Laboratory Systems, Japan).
Categorical baseline characteristics are summarised by frequency and per cent, and continuous characteristics are reported as the mean±SD or median and IQR as appropriate. Group comparisons were made using a student t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. ANCA-positive conversion and MPA diagnosis were estimated by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Survival was evaluated using a Kaplan–Meier curve and compared between groups using log-lank tests. Cox regression analysis was used to determine whether the following factors increased the risk of ANCA-positive conversion: sex, age, smoking history, emphysema, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/FVC ratio, lung diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), white cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive protein, serum creatine, urine protein, urine blood, rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody and Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6). Rheumatoid factor ≥20 IU/mL and antinuclear antibody ≥1/80 were considered to indicate positivity. Emphysema was considered present if areas of low attenuation were present on high-resolution CT images. Cox regression analysis was used to determine whether the following factors increased patient mortality: sex, age, smoking history, emphysema, FVC, FEV1/FVC, DLCO, MPO- or PR3-ANCA positivity, white cell count, ESR, C reactive protein, serum creatine, urine protein, urine blood, rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody and KL-6. In all analyses, a p value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. We conducted all statistical analyses with SAS V.9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).
Patient characteristics and ANCA positivity at IPF diagnosis
Of the 504 patients, 20 (4%) were MPO-ANCA positive and 16 (3.2%) were PR3-ANCA positive (table 1) at diagnoses. All of these patients were Asian. The ANCA-positive patients were older than the ANCA-negative patients. ESR and C reactive protein values were higher and FVC was lower in the ANCA-positive versus ANCA-negative patients. Rheumatoid factor positivity and antinuclear antibody positivity were more likely to be seen in the ANCA-positive patients than in the ANCA-negative patients.
Incidence density of ANCA-positive conversion
During the disease course, MPO-ANCA or PR3-ANCA-positive conversion occurred in 15 (5.7%) and 14 (5.3%), respectively, of the 264 patients in whom ANCA was repeatedly measured over a median follow-up period of 5.03 years (IQR, 3.11–8.07 years). Thus, the incidence density of MPO-ANCA and PR3-ANCA-positive conversion was 13.10 and 12.23 cases per 1000 person-years, respectively (figure 2).
Risk factors for MPO- or PR3-ANCA-positive conversion
In a multivariate Cox regression hazard model, rheumatoid factor positivity was associated with MPO-ANCA-positive conversion (adjusted HR 3.435, 95% CI 1.032 to 11.440, p=0.044), as was an ESR of ≥40 mm/h (adjusted HR 3.361, 95% CI 1.100 to 10.271, p=0.033).
Incidence density of MPA development according to ANCA positivity
Ten patients with MPA at IPF diagnosis were excluded from this analysis. Among these 10 patients (5 men, 5 women) with MPA at IPF diagnosis, the median age was 69 (range, 62–79) years, 7 had rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, 10 had diffuse alveolar haemorrhage, 3 had acute respiratory failure, 4 had fever, 5 had mononeuritis multiplex and 2 had purpuric rash. In total, 9 patients in the cohort of 504 developed MPA. Among these 9 patients (5 men, 4 women), the median age was 73 (range, 60–76) years, 7 had rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, 3 had diffuse alveolar haemorrhage, 3 had acute respiratory failure, 8 had fever, and 1 patient each had mononeuritis multiplex, gastrointestinal bleeding and purpuric rash (table 2). Three of the 20 patients with MPO positivity and none of the 16 patients with PR3-ANCA positivity at IPF diagnosis developed MPA over a median follow-up period of 2.42 years (IQR 1.38–4.92 years) (incidence density of 39.4 cases per 1000 MPO-ANCA-positive IPF person-years and 0.00 cases per 1000 PR3-ANCA-positive IPF person-years, respectively; figure 3). Of the 468 patients with ANCA negativity at IPF diagnosis, 6 developed MPA over a median follow-up period of 4.02 years (IQR 1.92–6.73 years) (incidence density of 2.75 cases per 1000 ANCA-negative IPF person-years), MPO-ANCA converted to positive in 5 patients at MPA diagnosis and 1 patient developed MPA 19 months after ANCA converted to positive. MPO-ANCA-positive patients developed MPA more frequently than did ANCA-negative patients (p<0.001).
Mortality according to ANCA positivity at IPF diagnosis
Of the 504 patients with IPF, death from any cause occurred in 245 (48.6%) patients over a median follow-up period of 3.95 years (IQR, 1.84–6.64 years). Patients died from progression of the IPF (35.9%), acute exacerbation of IPF (21.0%), pneumonia (10.1%), lung cancer (9.3%), other pulmonary diseases (2.4%), MPA (1.2%), non-pulmonary diseases (10.9%) and unknown causes (9.2%). Five-year and 10-year mortality rates were, respectively, 61.3% and 85.7% for ANCA-positive patients, and 37.6% and 70.5% for ANCA-negative patients at IPF diagnosis. The log-rank test showed the difference between survival curves of ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative patients to be significant (p=0.001) (figure 4). Five-year mortality rates of MPO-ANCA and PR3-ANCA positive patients were 51.3% and 81.7%, respectively. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, older age, PR3-ANCA positivity, %FVC predicted <70%, FEV1/FVC ≥70% and DLCO <70% were found to be negative prognostic factors (table 3). Since FEV1/FVC ≥70% was an independent risk factor of IPF mortality, we compared baseline parameters of patients with IPF whose FEV1/FVC ratio was ≥70% and <70%. In comparison with patients with an FEV1/FVC ≥70%, patients with an FEV1/FVC <70% were significantly more frequently male (90.2% vs 72.5%, p=0.006), smokers (94.1% vs 75.3%, p<0.001), had emphysema (70.6% vs 21.7%, p<0.001) and had higher %FVC predicted (89.00±18.43 vs 72.74±18.97 mL, p<0.001).
MPA development and mortality in patients with positive and positively-converted MPO-ANCA according to corticosteroid therapy before MPA onset
In this cohort of patients with IPF, a total of 35 patients were positive for MPO-ANCA (20 at IPF diagnosis and 15 subsequent seroconversion). Among this retrospective cohort of patients with IPF from 1998 to 2013, some patients received corticosteroid treatment, although this is no longer recommended in the international guidance published in 2012.32 Among the 35 MPO-ANCA-positive patients, 8 had received systemic corticosteroids and none developed MPA. Among the remaining 27 MPO-ANCA-positive patients who never received steroids, 9 developed MPA. Accordingly, the incidence of developing MPA tended to be lower in patients treated with corticosteroids than in patients not treated with corticosteroids (p=0.063). There was no significant difference in survival between patients treated or not treated with corticosteroids (p=0.323) (figure 5).
This long-term longitudinal study of a large cohort of patients with IPF resulted in five important findings. First, the incidence density of ANCA-positive conversion in patients with IPF was 13.10 cases per 1000 person-years. Second, some patients with IPF with MPO-ANCA positivity at IPF diagnosis or with MPO-ANCA positive conversion during the disease course developed MPA. Third, rheumatoid factor positivity was a risk factor for MPO-ANCA-positive conversion, and an ESR ≥40 mm/h was a risk factor for PR3-ANCA-positive conversion. Fourth, PR3-ANCA positivity at IPF diagnosis was an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with IPF. Fifth, corticosteroid therapy might reduce MPA development in patients with IPF with MPO-ANCA positivity or positive conversion.
The prevalence of MPO- and PR3-ANCA positivity in patients with IPF at diagnosis has been reported to vary between 4.9–32.1% and 2.2–3.7%, respectively,23 ,24 ,33 and these prevalences were comparable to ours. In patients with IPF with MPO-ANCA positivity at diagnosis, Nozu et al24 reported that 4 of 17 patients developed MPA, and Kang et al33 reported that 2 of 27 patients developed MPA. Ando et al23 reported that two of six patients with MPO-ANCA-positive conversion developed MPA. These studies and ours suggest that not only patients with IPF who are MPO-ANCA positive at diagnosis but also those who convert to positive develop MPA.
Gaudin et al19 reported that MPO-ANCA-associated and PR3-ANCA-associated vasculitis were both associated with pulmonary fibrosis. However, subsequent reports of patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and IPF were restricted to MPO-ANCA-positive patients.15–17 ,22 ,24 In the present study, some patients with IPF had MPO-ANCA or PR3-ANCA positivity or positive conversion. However, all of the patients who developed MPA were MPO-ANCA-positive patients. Previous studies and ours indicate that MPO-ANCA should be measured regularly in patients with IPF. Although the clinical benefit of testing for PR3-ANCA might be limited, it may be helpful because our study indicated that PR3-ANCA positivity was an independent risk factor for mortality.
Arulkumaran et al15 reported that of 14 patients with MPA and interstitial lung disease, 2 were diagnosed as having interstitial lung disease 6 months and 3 years, respectively, before MPA. Three of their patients presented with MPA before interstitial lung disease with a mean interval of 9.7 years, and 9 patients presented with features of interstitial lung disease and MPA concurrently. If pulmonary fibrosis develops after the onset of MPA, repeated episodes of alveolar haemorrhage due to pulmonary capillaritis could be the pathogenesis of interstitial fibrosis. Tanaka et al25 reported that in nine patients with interstitial pneumonia associated with MPO-ANCA but without MPA, surgical lung biopsy showed neither capillaritis nor vasculitis. Therefore, if patients with IPF are proved to have MPO-ANCA at IPF diagnosis, two possible pathogeneses of pulmonary fibrosis may be present: MPO-ANCA is playing a direct role in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis, and pulmonary fibrosis is inducing MPO-ANCA. During the disease course, if MPO-ANCA-positive conversion occurs, IPF might be inducing MPO-ANCA and MPA.
Therapy with corticosteroids in combination with other immunosuppressants is the current mainstay of MPA treatment.4 ,34 However, the 2012 official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement recommends that patients with IPF should not be treated with corticosteroid monotherapy or combined corticosteroid and immunomodulator therapy.32 Moreover, increased risks of death and hospitalisation were observed in patients with IPF who were treated with a combination of prednisone, azathioprine and N-acetylcysteine, as compared with placebo.35 However, if patients with IPF develop MPA, patients should be treated with corticosteroids because untreated MPA is normally rapidly progressive and fatal.4 Thus, should patients with IPF with MPO-ANCA positivity but without MPA be treated with corticosteroids? Ando et al reported that 6 of 9 MPO-ANCA-positive patients with IPF were treated with corticosteroid therapy and none developed MPA, but 2 of 3 patients not treated with corticosteroids developed MPA.23 We hypothesise that corticosteroid therapy in patients with IPF with MPO-ANCA positivity might have some benefit in reducing the development of MPA.
One limitation of this study is that it was retrospective, so some clinical and laboratory findings were not available. Second, because the decision to measure ANCA was made by referring doctors and the interval of measurement of ANCA was not unified, we could not conclude how often ANCA should be measured in patients with IPF. Finally, because the ELISA kit had been changed four times during the study period, we could not accurately assess the association of ANCA titres with MPA development.
In conclusion, the present study showed that the incidence density of ANCA-positive conversion in patients with IPF was 13.10 cases per 1000 person-years. Some patients with IPF with MPO-ANCA positivity at IPF diagnosis or with MPO-ANCA-positive conversion during the disease course developed MPA. PR3-ANCA positivity at IPF diagnosis was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality. Clinical trials to determine whether corticosteroid therapy can reduce MPA development and prolong survival in MPO-ANCA-positive patients with IPF should be considered
The authors offer their sincerest thanks to Drs Youtaro Takaku and Kazuyoshi Kurashima of the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, for their handling of the diagnosis and treatment of the patients with IPF.
Contributors NK performed the primary data analysis. NT had the idea for the study. NT and TK reviewed the chest radiographs and high-resolution CT scans. NK and NT wrote the manuscript. TI, TY and YS contributed to study design, interpreted the data and reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was approved by the institutional review board of Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement No additional data are available.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.