Discussion
Since inadequate length of OA use may lead to VTE recurrence, whereas excessive length of OA use may result in bleeding, it is warranted to determine the optimal length of OA use for patients with acute PE who require secondary thromboprophylaxis, in order to achieve the maximum benefit. In the current study that investigated the optimal length of OA use to achieve maximum benefit within 5 years after OA discontinuation in patients with acute PE who required secondary thromboprophylaxis, a 2 to 3 years of OA use demonstrated superiority or non-inferiority with respect to all items of outcomes, compared with either longer or shorter length of OA use.
In the current study, the median course of PE of all patients was 7.3 (6.2 to 8.4) years. In some previous studies, for the long-term outcomes in patients with acute PE, the cumulative all-cause mortality rates 5–10 years after the occurrence of acute PE was 30% to 45%,16 17 the 5-year PE-related mortality rate was 2.9%,18 the cumulative VTE recurrence incidence 5–10 years after index diagnosis was 25%–36%,19 20 and the 5-year major bleeding incidence was 1.3%.16 The current cumulative all-cause mortality, PE-related mortality, VTE recurrence, major bleeding were basically consistent with those in the previous studies.16–20
To our best knowledge, the studies which are comparable to the current one are scarce, despite there were several relevant studies. The results from the current study were basically consistent with that from the study of Chopard et al,8 in which extended OA treatment over 2.5 years after acute PE diagnosis may provide a net clinical benefit, compared with those without extended anticoagulation, although its mean duration of study follow-up was only 2.1±0.3 years. In the PADIS-PE randomised clinical trial, for 371 patients who had experienced a first episode of symptomatic unprovoked PE and had been treated initially for six uninterrupted months with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), an additional 18 months of anticoagulation treatment with warfarin reduced the composite outcome of recurrent venous thrombosis and major bleeding compared with placebo. However, such benefit was not maintained at the end of 42 months of follow-up after the discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy (20.8% of events in the warfarin group vs 24.0% in the placebo, HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.18).21 The PADIS-PE study suggested that an overall 2-year VKA anticoagulant therapy can benefit patients with unprovoked acute PE. Nevertheless, such duration is not an optimal one since its legacy effect could not sustain after the discontinuation of anticoagulation treatment. In a meta-analysis of six randomised trials including 5920 patients with VTE at intermediate risk of recurrence, compared with the shorter anticoagulation arm (7.5 months), the longer anticoagulation arm (18.6 months) was associated with a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.75; 0.8% vs 1.8%). PE-related death was also lower in the longer anticoagulation arm (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.83; 0.2% vs 0.6%), compared with the shorter one.22 It is partly consistent with the result of the current study with respect to the PE-related mortality, whereas it is inconsistent with the result of the current study with regards to the all-cause mortality. The reason for the disparity in all-cause mortality may lie in that the all-cause mortality could be impacted by a variety of causes of death during an average follow-up period being longer than 7 years after PE diagnosis in the present study, which was much longer than the average 18.6 months after PE diagnosis in the previous study.22 In the SURVET Study, for 615 patients with first-ever unprovoked VTE who had completed 3–12 months of OA treatment and were randomly assigned to sulodexide, which is a natural glycosaminoglycan with antithrombotic and profibrinolytic activities or placebo for 2 years in addition to elastic stockings, VTE recurred in 15 patients who received sulodexide (N=307) and in 30 patients who received placebo (N=308) (HR: 0.49 (0.27 to 0.92); p=0.025).23 It indicated that a 2–3 years of antithrombotic therapy is beneficial for patients with unprovoked VTE, being basically consistent with the results of the current study.
The results of the current study may yield some clinical implications for clinicians. First, for patients with acute PE who require secondary thromboprophylaxis, it is recommended to use OA for more than 2 years in order to reduce long-term PE-related mortality, although it is futile for the improvement of all-cause mortality. Second, overall OA use for 2 to 3 years after PE diagnosis may be the optimal length to acquire long-term low incidence of VTE recurrence, an acceptable bleeding rates and the best net clinical benefit, for patients with acute PE who require secondary thromboprophylaxis. Third, unfortunately, the cumulative risk of bleeding increases gradually along with the gradual elongation of length of OA use. It is not recommended to use OA for more than 3 years due to the possibly high bleeding risk and inferior net clinical benefit. Of note, notwithstanding the results of the current study suggested that 2 to 3 years of OA use is the optimal length for an outcome 5 years after OA discontinuation in patients with acute PE who require extended anticoagulation, whether the results still hold true longer than 5 years after OA discontinuation is unclear. In addition, due to the inconsiderable number of patients who underwent OA use for more than 3 years, this patient population was not subdivided according to the specific length of OA use. As such, the relationship is unknown between the specific length of OA use in patients who underwent OA use for more than 3 years and the 5-year outcomes after OA discontinuation. Nevertheless, the benefit of an overall OA use for 2–3 years is at least non-inferior to an OA use for more than 3 years with respect to outcomes by and large. Taking into account of the increasing bleeding risk along with the gradual extension of OA use, the OA use for 2 to 3 years should be preferred than that for more than 3 years. Finally, despite a general length of 3 or 6 months of anticoagulation is defined for acute PE patients, it does not mean that they have to neither more nor less undergo 3 or 6 months of anticoagulation without any variation, due to unpredictable change of risk factors for thrombosis or bleeding. OA may be prematurely terminated due to major bleeding or proceed owing to unsolved risk factors for thrombosis. Likewise, the same applies to PE patients requiring secondary thromboprophylaxis. Being similar to the initial 3 or 6 months of anticoagulation for acute PE, the 2–3 years of anticoagulation for secondary thromboprophylaxis is also a general recommendation.
Several limitations have to be acknowledged. First, a prospective study is warranted since the current one was a retrospective study. Nevertheless, the propensity score matching may minimise bias caused by confounding factors although not comparable to randomised controlled trial. Second, the sample is relatively inconsiderable since the number of patients who adhere to long-term OA use are relatively small, not to mention that the subjects are required to be followed up for 5 years after OA discontinuation. Third, the incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) was not included in the outcomes of the subjects due to most of the patients have not been investigated for the presence or absence of CTEPH by using right heart catheterisation. Fourth, we only adopted major bleeding incidence instead of the incidence of all kinds of bleeding for the evaluation of adverse events in the current study since non-major bleeding events especially minor ones were intractable to be precisely collected in a post hoc review. The results might have been different if all the other kinds of bleeding had been included. Nevertheless, in the study of Wells et al, which assessed the benefit–risk of extended anticoagulation versus placebo in VTE patients who had undergone 6–12 months of anticoagulation, the net clinical benefit was defined as the composite of recurrent VTE and major bleeding.10 Fifth, heterogeneity may exist because the present study that covered different types of OA; however, subgroup analysis revealed consistency among different types of OA. Sixth, detailed medication adherence diaries were not obtained despite compliance was excellent based on the self-reports of all patients. Finally, the present results are not applicable to edoxaban and apixaban since these two agents were not incorporated into the current study.
In conclusion, the results of the current study suggest that, for patients with acute PE who require secondary thromboprophylaxis, 2–3 years (30 months preferred) of overall OA use after PE diagnosis could be an optimal length of treatment course to achieve maximum benefit within 5 years after OA discontinuation. The prospective validation of the current results is warranted in the future. The results of this study may be favourable for clinicians to make decisions about the length of OA use in this patient population.