Cough is a protective reflex to prevent aspiration and can be triggered by a multitude of stimuli. The commonest form of cough is caused by upper respiratory tract infection and has no benefit to the host. The virus hijacks this natural defence mechanism in order to propagate itself through the population. Despite the resolution of the majority of cold symptoms within 2 weeks, cough can persist for some time thereafter. Unfortunately, the mechanism of infectious cough brought on by pathogenic viruses, such as human rhinovirus, during colds, remains elusive despite the extensive work that has been undertaken. For socioeconomic reasons, it is imperative we identify the mechanism of cough. There are several theories which have been proposed as the causative mechanism of cough in rhinovirus infection, encompassing a range of different processes. Those of which hold most promise are physical disruption of the epithelial lining, excess mucus production and an inflammatory response to rhinovirus infection which may be excessive. And finally, neuronal modulation, the most convincing hypothesis, is thought to potentiate cough long after the original stimulus has been cleared. All these hypotheses will be briefly covered in the following sections.
- Respiratory Infection
- Viral infection
- Airway Epithelium
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Cough is a common symptom associated with upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).1–4 In some patients, coughing can persist leading to a syndrome known as postviral or postinfectious cough which is arbitrarily defined as lasting from 3 to 8 weeks, with normal chest radiograph findings.5 ,6 In some individuals, cough persists even longer, when it is termed a chronic cough.7 While a normal cough is a vital protective reflex preventing aspiration, cough hypersensitivity is the mechanism thought to underlie almost all types of pathological cough.8 This has been demonstrated in URTI.9–11
Cough causes a plethora of complications affecting the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and respiratory systems, with far-reaching psychological, neurological and musculoskeletal effects.6 ,7 ,12 While there are many agents on the market to reduce the frequency of cough and aid in the clearance of mucus, a systematic review of over-the-counter preparations failed to recommend any available treatment.13 For example, the use of codeine in respiratory tract infection-associated cough was found to be no more effective than its vehicle,14 and prescription-only medications are often unsuitable for certain groups of individuals.15
There are three metrics which are used to study cough: cough challenge, cough counting, and subjective end points such as visual analogue scale or quality of life. Cough challenge studies include the use of pro-tussive agents, such as capsaicin and citric acid, which stimulate transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels to induce cough.16–18 TRP channels have been popularised as pro-tussive irritant receptors.19 ,20 However, on account of repeated clinical trial failures in patients with chronic cough using both cough counting and subjective measures, TRPV1 and A1 antagonists as anti-tussives have failed to reach the clinic,21 and an unpublished RCT of inhaled TRPA1 antagonist GRC 17536 (personal communication AHM, 2015). A recent shift of focus now proposes that other channels and receptors, such as P2X receptors, different TRP channels including TRPV4 and TRPM822–24 may be responsible for the observed hypersensitivity. It seems unlikely that one single channel, or receptor, is responsible for causing cough hypersensitivity in all participants in cases of postviral and chronic cough.
Research into URTI and cough faces many problems. Research which relies on natural infection of human volunteers is open to a range of uncontrollable variability including incubation time and causative agent (virus genus and serotype). There is also a lack of suitable animal models for studying HRV due to high host specificity of attachment receptors. Major group HRV requires human ICAM-1 receptor25 which is not present in guinea pigs, an animal classically used for studying the cough reflex. However, pathogens such as parainfluenza virus, a rarer cause of the common cold, can infect guinea pigs and produce a postviral cough with a hypersensitive airway response to capsaicin.26 As a result, studying the effects of HRV infection is often carried out in vitro using cell systems. There is a plethora of research into viral induced effects characterised from various respiratory cell lines, leading to a variety of proposed mechanisms for the induction of cough.
HRV infection results in the production a broad profile of inflammatory mediators in the host. The primary inflammatory cytokines reported in HRV infection are interferon (IFN), interleukin (IL) 1, IL-6, IL-8, tumour necrosis factor (TNF) α, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and RANTES. The infection leads to massive upregulation,27 and, consequently, it is often described as a ‘cytokine disease’.28 Many symptoms are thought to occur as a result of the effects of inflammatory cytokines releasing of mediators. For example, sore throat may occur as a result of the release of bradykinin.29 The role of these endogeneous mediators is discussed below.
The proinflammatory mediator bradykinin has been suggested as a potent tussive modulator of TRPA1 and TRPV1.30–32 It is thought to work through phospholipase C (PLC) causing channel phosphorylation and subsequent sensitisation.33 Elevated levels of bradykinin are found in the BAL fluid of patients with inflammatory airway conditions.34 Bradykinin has also been suggested to mediate ACE inhibitor cough32 which affects 15% of patients.35 Bradykinin and PGE2 possess the ability to sensitise the airways to cough stimulus in animal studies which can be effectively abolished on simultaneous application of antagonists to both TRPV1 and TRPA1.36
Tachykinin peptides, neurokinin A and B, and substance P, are inflammatory neuropeptides, which collectively induce airway hyper-responsiveness, bronchial constriction,37 and increased vascular permeability.38 They also generate substantial mucus secretion39 and the secretion of inflammatory mediators from immune cells.40–42 It has been suggested that inhibition of tachykinin metabolism by ACE inhibitors is an alternate mechanism for ACE inhibitor cough.43 In HRV infection, tachykinins are released from neurons on TRPV1 activation.40 Unfortunately, the mechanism underlying this activity is currently unknown, and understanding such channel interaction may hold the key to modulating the development of viral and postviral cough. Reduction of degradation of tachykinins by neutral endopeptidases in respiratory viral infection44 are likely to enhance the noxious effects of tachykinins.
Despite its scarcity, substance P in humans has been found to be upregulated, both in nasal epithelium and plasma in chronic cough sufferers.45–47 The efficacy of substance P, mediated by tachykinin NK-1 receptors,48 is greatly enhanced by prior inflammation. Furthermore, when in excess, it is suggested to lower the threshold of pain perception to noxious stimuli, as demonstrated in several pain-associated disease states.49 ,50 In guinea pigs, the role of substance P in cough has been extensively investigated. Substance P results in bronchoconstriction but highly variable cough.51 Likewise, in healthy individuals, inhalation of substance P does not cause cough. However, at the same concentration, substance P has the ability to elicit cough in patients with common colds,52 suggesting a hypersensitive state induced by the virus. Additionally, the microvascular leakage of substance P is thought to activate rapidly adapting receptors (RARs)53 which may add to the irritant effect in common cold.
Calcitonin gene-related peptide
Evidence for the role of another neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is mixed. TRP channel (TRPV1) activation induces and controls the release40 ,54 from C-fibre terminals.55 CGRP has an inhibitory effect in substance P-induced bronchoconstriction,56 and when deficient, causes airway hyper-responsiveness.57 However, an increase in CGRP has been shown in many pain-associated conditions, including migraine and various forms of inflammation.58 ,59 Chronic cough sufferers have been shown to have increased neuronal levels of CGRP60 ,61 associated with the enhanced sensitivity to capsaicin.61 These effects appear to be mediated through the cytokines, IL-1β and TNF-α.59 In respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection, a rarer cause of URTI in the adult, the development of airway hyper-responsiveness appears to arise through a disruption of CGRP balance.57 ,62 However, this fails to explain the increased levels found in sufferers of chronic cough. Unlike substance P, CGRP does not directly induce mucus secretion,63 but may indirectly enhance through vasodilation.
The likelihood that substance P, CGRP or neurokinins have some role in cough hypersensitivity is high. Opiates have been shown to be highly effective in a subgroup of patients with cough.15 A possible mode of action is through prejunctional inhibition of peptide release-preventing neurotransmission either centrally, or from afferent nerves adjacent to inflammatory mediator receptors.40
Leukotrienes are potent inflammatory mediators of chemotaxis, bronchoconstriction and vascular permeation,64 which are predominately produced by leucocytes, but also by other inflammatory immune cells. Data is scarce on the extent leukotrienes play in HRV infection. However, Seymour et al65 identified a significant increase of precursor enzymes within the airways during HRV infection in healthy individuals, which can potentially increase the capacity of leukotriene B4 and C4 synthesis. Muscarinic receptor involvement has been implicated in the production of leukotriene B4.66 In cough-associated eosinophilic inflammation, blockade of leukotriene receptors has been shown to be efficacious.67 However, in a recent study, montelukast, a potent inhibitor of the receptor of leukotriene C4 and D4, has no effect on cough in the common cold.68
Eosinophils are important mediators of cough in allergic disease but their role in viral infection is less clear. Eosinophils, if activated, during viral infection release a multitude of molecules including leukotrienes, growth factors, cytokines and major basic protein (MBP).69 MBP binds to as well as alters prejunctional M2 receptor function,70 ,71 and increases tachykinin release.44 MBP is cytotoxic72 and has been implicated in peripheral nerve remodelling.73 It is found in higher levels in nasal aspirates from children during HRV infection.74 Not only are eosinophils implicated in tachykinin modulation, but during degranulation they also release a potent peroxidase which generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species. These harmful oxidants are known potent TRPA1 agonists,75 ,76 which are receptors ascribed to cause cough in humans and guinea pigs.20
Muscarinic receptors are highly characterised in airway diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with limited evidence of their involvement in respiratory infections. Of the five muscarinic receptors (M1-5), only M1-3 can be found in the respiratory system. M1 is expressed on epithelial cells and submucosal glands of pulmonary veins.77 M3 receptors are heavily expressed on smooth muscle, inflammatory and submucosal cells78 where they mediate bronchoconstriction, mucosal secretion and inflammatory responses.79 M2 receptors predominately regulate cardiac contraction, but can also be localised to respiratory smooth muscle.77 However, the most important role of M2 receptors in the airway is the prejunctional inhibition of acetylcholine release to limit the degree of bronchoconstriction.80 Respiratory viral agents, parainfluenza and RSV, have been shown to cause depletion and dysfunction of M2 receptors,81 thereby exaggerating cholinergic activity. This has been further shown in double-stranded (ds) RNA animal models, independent of inflammation,81 and mediated by IFN release.82 Therefore, viral infection-induced bronchoconstriction, airway hyper-responsiveness and mucus secretion causing cough may be indirectly mediated through M2 receptors.82 M2 dysregulation can be reversed with dexamethasone83 or pilocarpine.80 However, Lowry et al84 found anticholinergic bronchodilators to be ineffective against cough in natural URTI. The potent topical corticosteroid, fluticasone, was also ineffective in significantly reducing symptoms of viral URTI and, indeed, significantly increased the bacterial colonisation of the upper airway.85
Many of the inflammatory mediators discussed above do not directly evoke cough but work synergistically through other pulmonary fibres where the threshold for cough is lowered to provoke the urge to cough. Thus, this change to sensory nerve functionality secondary to these mediators may potentiate and prolong a cough response during and after respiratory viral infection.
By comparison with other respiratory viruses such as influenza, HRV is renowned for its minimal cytopathic effects.86 It has been suggested that influenza has a higher incidence of cough than that seen with HRV infections.87 Thus, physical disruption of airway integrity may be a factor in a heightened cough response. HRV, or synthetic dsRNA stimuli polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly(I:C)), is able to disrupt airway epithelial cells via disruption of tight junction complexes at apicolateral membranes through dissociation of zona occludin (ZO) 1, occludin, claudin-1, E-cadherin and β-catenin. This leads to a significant reduction in transepithelial resistance88–90 indicating a loss of epithelial integrity (figure 1A). Transepithelial resistance can also be decreased through respiratory-localised TRPV4 activation,91 and causes disruption of tight junction complexes leading to increased permeability. But whether these are related or not, are unknown. Whether this viral induced loss of integrity is dependent or independent of an inflammatory response is open to debate.
ROS and other oxidants cause barrier disruption and affect permeability in tissues throughout the body92 through cytoskeletal and tight junction interruption. This effect is mirrored in polarised epithelial cells, such as those within the airways.88 ,93 During infection, HRV causes oxidative stress independent of viral replication or ICAM-1-mediated viral attachment.94 The mechanism is thought to be via a NOD-like receptor X-1 (NLRX-1) interaction with dsRNA causing a translocation of NADPH oxidase-1 (NOX-1) leading to the generation of ROS and oxidants.93 ,95 By contrast, ROS production is necessary for clearance of viral infections, but requires stringent regulation. Interaction with dsRNA receptor NLRX-1 induces mitochondrial ROS generation.96 ,97 This is likely a result of mitochondrial antiviral signalling protein interaction with dsRNA,98–100 an important component of HRV lifecycle.101 ROS are also potent agonists of TRPA1 and TRPV1,75 ,76 which poses a potential interaction route between HRV and TRP channels.
Other investigators propose that physical disruption is an inflammatory-dependent process caused by TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-8 which mediate the tight junction dysregulation.102–104 A cytokine-induced effect may, however, be secondary to signalling pathways aforementioned, and which mechanism predominates may be dependent on specific cell type.
Consequently, varying degrees of barrier disruption and physical damage have the potential to cause a multitude of effects. A loss of integrity to airway barriers enables the transmigration of opportunistic bacteria causing secondary respiratory infection.90 It can also lead to dysregulation of intracellular signalling facilitating the upregulation of growth factors.105–107 Finally, in exposed animals, an enhanced activation of sensory nerve fibres leads to airway hyper-responsiveness108 and epithelial repair is delayed.109 Thus, there is a cycle of cytokine-induced barrier damage (figure 1B) leading to epithelial shedding. Airway epithelial lining begins to become permeable to larger molecules88 leading to a cycle of hypersensitivity and further damage.
Physical disruption to airways described above is a well-characterised part of the pathophysiology of lung diseases including asthma and cystic fibrosis, but the role it plays in URTI, such as HRV, has only recently begun to become clear, but may be crucially important in patients with pre-existing respiratory disease.
Excessive mucus production and secretion is common in URTI1 ,110 initiating symptoms such as a cough and sneezing, and thus facilitating transmission of infection.3 ,111 HRV, in particular, upregulates the transcription of various mucin genes including MUC5AC.112–114 This pathway is particularly involved in mucus production and release, but this complex process (figure 2) has yet to be completely characterised. Using nuclear factor (NF) κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors, the pathway induced during HRV infection was originally identified. The mechanism is independent of serotype and genotype and is inducible by artificial genomic stimulus using poly(I:C).112 NFκB is upregulated as part of HRV lifecycle,115 ,116 so it is unsurprising that it plays a pivotal role in the production of symptoms during infection, and is essential for MUC5AC production. HRV is able to induce mucosal cell metaplasia through a novel TLR3-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) coupling and the induction of EGFR ligands,113 including transforming growth factor α. This results in the production and secretion of mucins via MUC5AC promoter regions.112 The process of mucus secretion and tight junction disruption go hand in hand. A loss of epithelial integrity where a dissociation of E-cadherens from adherens tight junction complexes causes the uncoupling of EGFR where it becomes readily activated. However, an excess of EGFR activation promotes goblet metaplasia and, thus, excessive mucus secretion.117 Muscarinic receptors are also involved in mucus secretion, mediated predominately through M3 in cooperation with M1118 and are regulated by M2.119 Since stimulation of muscarinic receptors transactivate EGFR to stimulate goblet cell mucus secretion,120 ,121 it is possible that HRV possesses the ability to interact with muscarinic receptors to cause this process. The implications of this are far-reaching as not only may it begin to explain the aetiology of a viral mucosal cough but also chronic mucus secretion such as occurs in chronic bronchitis.
A counter-regulatory mechanism to HRV-induced TLR-EGFR coupling is by induction of the transcription factor sterile-α-motif-pointed domain ETS-factor (SPDEF). SPDEF inhibits TLR signalling and type I IFN release to dampen the proinflammatory response induced by HRV.122 SPDEF is a transcriptional modulator with a wide variety of roles including endocrine and androgen interaction,123 ,124 however, recently this transcription modulator was found to regulate goblet cell metaplasia123 ,125 and upregulate genes associated with mucus production,126 including MUC5AC.125 It has been suggested that SPDEF initiates recovery and protects against excessive inflammatory damage during metaplasia. Dysregulation of this pathway may permit the cycle of cough and damage to persist, exposing basal membranes and nerve fibres, allowing HRV-induced physical damage and mucus overproduction to act synergistically.
Many patients have a dry or non-productive cough, and thus, an important cofactor mucus production alone is insufficient to explain coughing in URTI. Excessive mucus may exacerbate cough by several mechanisms including a stretch response and altered tonicity. Present within mucus are nucleosides and nucleotides, namely ATP and its breakdown products.127 ATP release occurs through cellular swelling mediated via pannexin-1128–130 and subsequent ATP-induced ATP release.131 Purinergic receptors are increasingly thought to be important mediators of cough hypersensitivity, and are discussed further in the section on neuronal mechanisms. In terms of mucus secretion, P2Y receptors enhance intracellular calcium concentrations and subsequent ciliary beat frequency.132 ,133 P2X7 is known to colocalise and interact with Pannexin-1.134–136 As part of the pore-forming complex of P2X7 receptor, pannexin-1 forms a death complex through extended pore dilation and increased permeability.135 ,137 ,138
In recent years, an increasing number of studies have begun to implicate TRPV4 in mucociliary clearance and airway defence, as it is essential for epithelial barrier function,91 and is highly expressed in ciliated tracheal cells.139–141 As well as arachidonic acid metabolites,142 TRPV4 can be activated through mechanical and osmotic stimulus,143 such as viscous and hypotonic mucus, to induce and regulate calcium release.144 Not only does this activate the channel but it also regulates ciliary beat frequency141 and mucus secretion, mediated by aquaporin 5.145
Cough is clearly a neuronal reflex, so the hypothesis that neuronal modulation underlies the pathogenesis of viral cough is the most convincing. However, at present, there is no single comprehensive mechanism which explains cough induced by HRV or indeed any other respiratory pathogen. Theories include a cooperative role of pulmonary oxidative stress in vagal sensory nerves between TRPV1, TRPA1 and P2X receptors.146 Direct viral damage to mitochondria leading to ROS production may modulate or influence cough.
During URTI sensitivity to capsaicin, citric acid and histamine are transiently increased with a reduction in cough threshold,10 ,11 ,147 ,148 without concurrent hyper-responsiveness to methacholine.11 This suggests that HRV-induced cough is independent of bronchial smooth-muscle tone. This was originally proposed to occur through the sensitisation of RARs,149 but despite convincing evidence, RARs do not express TRPV1 receptors and are insensitive to chemical stimuli.150 As such, they are no longer proposed to be the primary fibre involved in the cough reflex,23 but may have a synergistic interaction with C-fibres.151 As a result of these findings, capsaicin-sensitive nerves are not the same nerves known to initiate pathological cough, despite the clear observation that inhaled aerosolised capsaicin produces a cough.18 These observed differences may be explained by phenotypic changes to nerve fibres induced during inflammation.152
Phenotypic changes imply altered gene expression and differentiation. In the guinea pig, low threshold mechanosensitive sensory nerves express TrkA,153 and application of other growth factors induce the functional expression of TRPV1 and TRPA1 de novo.152 In vivo research in the rat and guinea pig models have found inflammatory states through increased nerve growth factor (NGF) levels causing a phenotypic change of A-delta fibres. They now resemble C-fibres as shown by the coexpression of substance P and NGF.154 ,155 NGF is transported to sensory neurons via DRG and is able to alter transcription of various proteins and peptides.156 Further research into the effect of NGF on TRPV1 by Chuang et al33 and Ganju et al157 found that NGF activates the PLC pathway. TRPV1 associates with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) in its resting state, but PLC activation causes the hydrolysis of PIP2 to release TRPV1 from constitutive inhibition, thus increasing the opening probability of TRPV1.
Similarly, HRV infection in the human has been shown to cause the upregulation of a number of growth factors.105–107 Specifically, HRV can induce the upregulation of NGF158 and inhalation of aerosolised NGF can enhance cough in the guinea pig citric acid-induced cough model through TRPV1 and TrkA (NGF receptor) activation.159 ,160 Despite the differences between human and guinea pig airway innervation, it is these modifications in expression that may lead to a phenotypic change during URTI.
Interest into the role of TRPV4 and P2X receptors in cough has been growing exponentially. A recent abstract publication showed that the application of a TRPV4 agonist facilitated the subsequent activation of P2X3 receptor through sensitisation of airway sensory nerves.161 This is not the first time TRPV4 and P2X3 receptors have been hypothesised to play a cooperative role in pathophysiology.162 It has become apparent that there is significant overlap between TRP channel and purinergic receptor functionality, which have given rise to the persuasive theory that TRPV4 and purinergic receptors play a cooperative role in pathological cough. ATP, which has been shown to enhance cough reflex sensitivity24 in response to citric acid and histamine challenge,163 potentiates through P2X2/X3-mediated bronchoconstriction.164 ,165 A successful clinical trial using AF-219, a P2X3 antagonist, reduced the incidence of coughing in patients with chronic cough by 75%,166 provides more convincing evidence that cough sensitivity may be strongly upregulated by the P2X pathway.
Neurogenic inflammation from afferent sensory neurons167 is mediated mostly, but not exclusively, by neuropeptides CGRP, neurokinins and substance P. When present, it is thought to be a protective reflex, facilitating healing and modulation of local immunity. Unfortunately, there is wide interspecies and, in man, intersubject variability in afferent sensory innervation making interpretation of experimental findings difficult to translate into clinical relevance. However, neurogenic inflammation is well characterised in several diseases, including migraine,168 and more controversially in asthma169 and rhinitis, the latter of which is common in URTI,170 where it likely amplifies maladaptive responses. Neurogenic inflammation is essential for sensory neurons to prime and respond to noxious stimuli quickly. Consequently, afferent neurons are abundant in TRP channels, P2X, PAMPs and DAMP receptors. Only a limited set of TLRs, 3, 4, 7 and 9, are present within nociceptive neurons,171–173 therefore, not all pathogens are capable of directly causing neurogenic inflammation. Stimulation of these TLRs induce an inward depolarisation to elicit neuronal sensitisation to pain stimuli.171–173 A recent interesting finding identified TLR 7 stimulation leading to an itch-specific sensory pathway,173 through intracellular microRNA let-7b. This, in turn, induces a rapid inward current in neurons, coexpressing TLR7 and TRPA1 to generate pain.174 ,175 Extracellular ATP is a crucial damage-associated molecular pattern molecule ligand which is released during damage and injury. In nociceptive neurons, P2X3 receptors are key to ATP recognition and pain production.176 Purinergic receptor P2Y2 is also responsive to ATP, and is capable of TRPV1 sensitisation and activation in the absence of TRPV1 stimuli,177 a similar sensation previously ascribed to TRPV4 through HRV-induced mucus overproduction. Cytokines, namely IL-1β and TNF-α, produced as a result of infection cause TRP channel sensitisation and activation through membrane phosphorylation.178 ,179 The resultant effect means that TRP channels respond to innocuous stimuli as noxious stimuli causing allodynia and, perhaps, allotussia.
There is a surprising degree of overlap in the physiological location and functionality of thermo-TRP channels and P2X receptors. TRPA1 is reported to possess mechanotransductive properties likely attributable to their distinct characteristic ankyrin repeats180 in the inner ear to permit hearing,181 although this is disputed by other groups.182 However, despite this, an interesting notable finding was the identification of P2X receptors, also within the inner ear, and that their initial action potential firing is necessary for the maturation of hearing.183 Likewise in the bladder, TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPV4, TRPA1 and TRPM8 all have mechanosensory roles184 to interpret stretch and pain perception,185 whilest P2X2 and P2X3 play a major role in distension sensation to excite a micturition reflex.186 Most relevant to cough is their influence on pain. TRPA1 and TRPV1 are well characterised to elicit pain signals in response to noxious stimuli187 ,188 P2X2, P2X3, P2X4 and P2X7 having all been identified to play some form of role in various types of pain.189–192 Most importantly in neuropathic pain where some pharmacological agents which have shown promising results in clinical trials.193 Relevant to these observations is that P2X2 and P2X3 receptors expressed on afferent neurons are home to the classic pain sensation channel TRPV1.194
The role of TRP channels in HRV-induced cough has recently been explained in a first-of-its-kind study by Abdullah et al.195 A novel infection site of HRV was identified in neuronal cell lines with concomitant upregulation of expressed TRP channels TRPA1, TRPV1 and TRPM8 found on airway sensory nerves. HRV infection accounts for up to 50% of exacerbations in asthmatics,196 and both asthmatic197 and chronic cough sufferers198 ,199 have higher levels of TRP channels expressed in their airways. This finding adds to the mounting evidence that TRP channels play a major role in cough during HRV infections, but requires further investigation to definitively confirm this.
A postviral cough is generally unresponsive to conventional pharmacological intervention, but has shown limited responsiveness to the anticholinergic drug, tiotropium,200 which leaves a major hole in our therapeutic armamentarium. Currently, treatment merely consists of dampening the inflammatory response with the use of antiinflammatories (such as naproxen),201 and cough suppressants (codeine-containing products and dextromethorphan),15 in the hope of reducing the frequency, severity and transmission of cough. Opiates, although commonly prescribed, are not generally recommended for viral cough due to their poor efficacy and significant adverse effect profile.15
The multiple mechanisms described above provide a confusing and inter-related ‘soup’ of potential therapeutic targets, dissecting which, are the key players involved in this common affliction that will be challenging. We suggest that modulation of the afferent neuronal hypersensitivity will provide the most fruitful target in what is essentially a benign and self-limiting disease. Other strategies, such as systemic immune modulation, run the risk of generating unforeseen off-target effects. The rewards for understanding the mechanism of viral-induced cough will have enormous impact on human morbidity.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement No additional data are available.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.