Automatic versus manual oxygen titration using a novel nasal high-flow device in medical inpatients with an acute illness: a randomised controlled trial

James Harper; Nethmi Kearns; Grace Bird; Irene Braithwaite; Allie Eathorne; Nicholas Shortt; Mark Weatherall; Richard Beasley

doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000843

Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest Content

Archive

Authors

About
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

PDF

PDF +
Supplementary
Material

XML

Respiratory research

Automatic versus manual oxygen titration using a novel nasal high-flow device in medical inpatients with an acute illness: a randomised controlled trial

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Harper J, Kearns N, Bird G, et al

Automatic versus manual oxygen titration using a novel nasal high-flow device in medical inpatients with an acute illness: a randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open Respiratory Research 2021;8:e000843. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000843

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Download to a citation manager

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password