Article Text

Systemic inflammation induced by exacerbation of COPD or pneumonia in patients with COPD induces cardiac troponin elevation
  1. Vidar Søyseth1,2,
  2. Natalia Kononova3,4,
  3. Anke Neukamm5,
  4. Nils Henrik Holmedahl6,
  5. Tor-Arne Hagve1,
  6. Torbjorn Omland2,7 and
  7. Gunnar Einvik3,4
  1. 1Medical Division, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway
  2. 2Campus Ahus, University of Oslo Faculty of Medicine, Lorenskog, Norway
  3. 3Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  4. 4Division of Medicine, Akerhus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
  5. 5Department of Cardiology, Akerhus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
  6. 6Glittreklinikken, Hakadal, Norway
  7. 7Lorenskog, Norway
  1. Correspondence to Dr Vidar Søyseth; vidar.soyseth{at}


Background Troponin is a biomarker of myocardial injury. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), troponin is an important determinant of mortality after acute exacerbation. Whether acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) causes troponin elevation is not known. Here, we investigated whether troponin is increased in AECOPD compared to stable COPD.

Methods We included 320 patients with COPD in the stable state and 63 random individuals from Akershus University hospital’s catchment area. All participants were ≥40 years old (mean 65·1 years, SD 7·6) and 176 (46%) were females. The geometric mean of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) was 6·9 ng/L (geometric-SD 2·6). They were followed regarding hospital admission for the subsequent 5 years.

Results During the 5-year follow-up, we noted 474 hospitalisations: Totally, 150 and 80 admissions were due to AECOPD or pneumonia, respectively. The geometric mean ratio with geometric SE (GSE) between cTnT at admission and stable state in AECOPD and pneumonia was 1·27 (GSE=1.11, p=0·023) and 1·28 (GSE=1.14, p=0·054), respectively. After inclusion of blood leucocyte count and C reactive protein at hospitalisation, these ratios attenuated to zero. However, we estimated an indirect of AECOPD and pneumonia on the ratio between hs-cTnT at admission and the stable state to 1·16 (p=0·022) and 1·22 (p=0·008), representing 91% (95% CI 82% to 100%) and 95% (95% CI 83% to 100%) of the total effects, respectively.

Conclusion AECOPD and pneumonia in patients with COPD is associated with higher cTnT levels. This association appears to be mediated by systemic inflammation.

  • clinical epidemiology
  • pneumonia
  • COPD exacerbations

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. Data are available upon request to the first author.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Key messages

  • Cardiac troponin increases in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation.

  • Cardiac troponin is increased in exacerbation and pneumonia in COPD. This increase is mediated by systemic inflammation that accompanies exacerbation and pneumonia in COPD.

  • Airways inflammation triggers a systemic inflammation that damages the heart muscles.


Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by an irreversible limitation of airflow that is usually progressive.1 A large proportion of patients experience periods with acute exacerbation of COPD symptoms (AECOPD) frequently triggered by airway infections and characterised by local airway and/or systemic inflammation.2 3 COPD is also accompanied by several comorbidities that may represent major health problems for patients. In particular, cardiovascular diseases are common and associated with increased mortality in patients with COPD.4–7 Previous studies have shown that a circulatory marker of myocardial damage, cardiac troponin (cTn), is an independent prognostic marker of mortality in the general population, in patients with stable COPD, and after AECOPD.8–10 The level of cTn has been shown to be inversely related to COPD severity as assessed by spirometry in the stable state.8 10–14 Moreover, the level of cTn has been reported to be higher in patients hospitalised for AECOPD than in patients with COPD in the stable state.15 16 However, prospective studies that examine the trajectory of cTn during the course of COPD are lacking, and whether myocardial damage, as indicated by cTn, progresses during an exacerbated state of COPD has not been determined. Furthermore, the mechanisms that may contribute to elevations in cTn have not been established. We conducted a longitudinal study of cTn in patients with COPD and healthy individuals for 5 years. As our laboratory uses the T-isomere of cTn, we chose T-isomere of cTn as our outcome parameter.

The primary aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that the cTnT level increases during incident severe AECOPD compared with stable COPD. We also aimed to assess the effect of other hospitalisations on the cTnT level and to elucidate possible mechanism(s) for any increase in cTnT.

Material and methods

Study population and design

The study was conducted at Akershus University Hospital and Glittre Rehabilitation Hospital. The population consisted of five cohorts: (1) candidates for long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), (2) patients with COPD participating in the rehabilitation course at the hospital’s outpatient clinic, (3) institutional COPD rehabilitation patients, (4) patients with COPD referred to the hospital’s outpatient clinic and (5) a presumably healthy reference group.17–19 All patients were in a stable state at inclusion, and none had AECOPD in the 6 weeks prior to inclusion. The reference group was selected by random sampling from the general population in the hospital’s recruitment area. Seven of these 62 participants (11%) had irreversible airflow limitation, but none of them had their COPD diagnosed by a doctor.17

The LTOT candidates and the outpatient rehabilitation group were re-examined in the stable state 3 and 6 months after inclusion as a part of the routine programme, respectively. All participants were followed regarding acute hospitalisation until 5 years after inclusion. The main diagnosis at discharge was classified using the International Classification of Disease version 10. We included all diagnoses in order to compare changes in troponin between stable state and any cause of hospitalisation. All participants provided written consent.


As our laboratory uses the T-isomere of cTn we chose T-isomere of cTn as our outcome parameter. High-sensitivity (hs)-cTnT at baseline was measured in venous serum samples stored at −80°C using a cobas e 411 immuno-analyser (Roche Diagnostics). The lower limit of detection was 3.0 ng/L. Using venous blood sampled at incident hospital admissions, hs-cTnT was analysed within 1 hour. Blood haemoglobin, blood leucocytes, serum C reactive protein (CRP) and serum creatinine were measured using routine laboratory methods. All of the blood samples were analysed at Akershus University Hospital’s Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory.

At inclusion, spirometry was performed at the respiratory laboratories at Akershus University Hospital or Glittre Lung Rehabilitation Hospital as recommended by the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society using the European Community for Coal and Steel reference equations.20 A reversibility test was performed with 400 µg salbutamol unless the participant had inhaled a short-acting beta-2-stimulator or a short-acting muscarine receptor antagonist within 4 hours before spirometry.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed in four levels. In the first level, we compared the baseline values of relevant variables in participants with incident hospitalisations to those of participants who were not hospitalised during the follow-up. Variables that were associated with hospitalisation with a corresponding p<0.2 were retained for further analysis in addition to established determinants of cTnT, such as gender, arterial oxygen tension and creatinine. Next, in the second level, we performed a multivariable linear regression analysis of the baseline data with hs-cTnT as the dependent variable using ordinary least square regression. In this analysis, we log-transformed hs-cTnT at inclusion (ln_ctnt0) because hs-cTnT was highly skewed to the right (online supplemental figure 1). Selected covariates were included using forward selection procedure. These covariates were added to the model, ordered by increasing numbers of missing values. In the final analysis of the baseline data, we invoked a model using multiple imputation.21

In the third level, we analysed the association between the level of hs-cTnT and the main diagnosis at each hospitalisation. The diagnoses were categorised into nine groups that were all inclusive and mutually exclusive. However, each participant could have several hospitalisations and different diagnoses during the follow-up. In these analyses, we invoked a multivariable model using log-transformed hs-cTnT (ln_ctnt) at follow-up as the outcome variable and diagnosis group at hospitalisation, baseline covariates (including baseline hs-cTnT) and routine clinical data during follow-up as the explanatory variables.

In the fourth level, we investigated whether the relationship between hs-cTnT and diagnosis was mediated in the longitudinal analyses by any of the following clinical variables at hospitalisation: blood leucocytes, serum CRP, arterial oxygen-tension, serum creatinine or heart rate. For details, see online supplemental figure 2. We performed these analyses using a multivariable mixed model with multiple imputations for missing values.21 If the model did not converge, mixed model was replaced by ordinary least square regression with robust SEs. The time elapsed between inclusion and hospitalisation was also included as a covariate. Mediation of the relationship between diagnosis group and hs-cTnT by any of the clinical variables at follow-up was assessed in four steps: (1) The relationship between the potential mediator and diagnosis, adjusted for relevant covariates using a linear mixed model had to be significant (online supplemental equation 1). (2) The direct effect (θ1) of diagnosis group on ln_ctnt (θ1, online supplemental equation 2) using all relevant covariates, including clinical follow-up data, as explanatory variables had to be non-significant. (3) After removal of the clinical covariates or combinations of the clinical follow-up variables from this model we estimated the total effect of diagnosis group on ln_ctnt (T1, online supplemental equation 3). Finally (4), we estimated the natural indirect effect (ie, the mediation effect) of diagnosis on hs-cTnT as the difference between T1 and θ1 (T1 − θ1). The SEs, and thereby the p values, of these differences were estimated using bootstrapping.22 For details, see the online supplemental (mediation).

Continuous covariates were categorised in quartiles, and the analyses were performed using Stata V.16.1 (StataCorp).


Baseline analyses

Table 1 shows the baseline data for participants who were never hospitalised and those who were ever hospitalised during 5 years of follow-up. Totally, 30 and 23 patients were ever hospitalised for exacerbation or pneumonia, respectively. Among these patients, eight patients were hospitalised for exacerbation as well as pneumonia. We observed that individuals who were hospitalised during the follow-up were older, had higher baseline hs-cTnT, markedly lower spirometry results and higher cumulative tobacco consumption than those who were never hospitalised. However, the prevalence of current smoking was not different between these two groups (table 1). Finally, the proportion of participants having incident hospitalisation during the follow-up was significantly different between the cohorts.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the total cohort at inclusion

The univariable analyses of associations between hs-cTnT and covariates at baseline are shown in online supplemental table 1A,B. These analyses show that hs-cTnT was higher in males, patients with pathological Q-waves on the ECG, and participants with arterial hypertension than in their respective counterparts. However, hs-cTnT was lower in current smokers than current non-smokers. Similarly, the univariate ordinary least square regression analyses of hs-cTnT (expressed as ln_ctnt0) as the outcome and continuous covariate (in quartiles) showed a positive association with age, peripheral leucocyte count, CRP, creatinine and heart rate (online supplemental table 1B). Similarly, we identified a significant inverse relationship between hs-cTnT and spirometry variables, and with arterial oxygen tension.

Three participants were excluded from the analyses because they had missing values for forced expiratory volume in 1 s, blood leucocytes or smoking at baseline. Therefore, the analyses were restricted to the remaining 380 participants. All of these individuals had complete data regarding cohort group, gender, age, peripheral leucocytes, creatinine, spirometry, history of arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease and smoking status. The baseline data were incomplete regarding ECG (n=70), arterial oxygen tension (n=75) and serum CRP (n=27; online supplemental table 2).

The results of the multivariable analysis of the baseline data with ln_ctnt0 as the dependent variable by increasing the number of covariates without missing values as explanatory variables in ordinary least square regression are shown in table 2. After inclusion of pathological Q-wave as a covariate, the number of individuals available for analysis was reduced to 310 participants (82%). At this step, we observed that the hs-cTnT level was higher in the COPD groups than the reference group. After inclusion of the remaining continuous covariates, the number of participants available for analysis was reduced to 270 individuals (71% of the total sample). Interestingly, after these adjustments, hs-cTnT was not higher in any of the patient groups than the reference group. After application of multiple imputations, the SEs were generally smaller than in the full model without imputations. The coefficients were mainly unchanged but, without imputations, the programme failed to estimate the coefficient for the LTOT candidates.

Table 2

Hs-cTnT measures at baseline and hospitalisation by diagnosis

Longitudinal analyses

The diagnoses, number of hospitalisations, number of hs-cTnT measurements and corresponding geometric mean and geometric SD (GSD) of hs-cTnT at baseline and hospitalisation by diagnosis group are summarised in table 3. The hs-cTnT measurements were available in 353 (74%) of hospitalisations. The fraction of hs-cTnT measurements was ≥85% in AECOPD, pneumonia, non-respiratory infections and diseases in the circulatory system. The overall geometric mean of hs-cTnT (corresponding GSD) at hospitalisation was 10.6 (2.5) ng/L (table 3). A detailed text version of the diagnoses is found in online supplemental table 3.

Table 3

Ratio between the level of high-sensitive cardiac troponin T in four different models

Analysis of the association between hs-cTnT and diagnosis at incident hospitalisations adjusted for follow-up time showed that hs-cTnT was significantly higher during the hospitalisation in AECOPD, pneumonia, ‘other lung diseases’, non-respiratory infections, circulatory diseases and ‘other diagnoses’ compared with the stable state (table 4, model 1). After adjusting for determinants of baseline hs-cTnT, the associations between hs-cTnT at follow-up and diagnoses was slightly attenuated for most of the diagnosis group (table 4, model 2). When we included baseline hs-cTnT as a covariate, the relationships between diagnosis group and hs-cTnT, that is, the total effect, attenuated substantially more and was no longer significant regarding ‘other diagnoses’ (table 4, model 3). The relationship between hs-cTnT and AECOPD remained significant, but the association with pneumonia was not significant (p=0.054). Moreover, in model 3, the association between hs-cTnT at hospital admission and baseline covariates were no longer significant. Thus, baseline determinants of hs-cTnT were removed from the model, resulting in a more parsimonious model with fewer imputations (online supplemental table 5, full model).

Table 4

The natural indirect effect of AECOPD, pneumonia and non-respiratory infections on the ratio of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T at admission versus stable state with corresponding GSE and p values mediated by peripheral leucocytes and CRP per quartile

In the next step, we added blood leucocytes, serum CRP, serum creatinine, arterial O2-tension and heart rate at hospital admission to the model. The association between all diagnoses, except circulatory diseases, and hs-cTnT (ie, the direct effect) at admission attenuated to zero (table 4, model 4). Furthermore, the relationships between hs-cTnT and leucocytes, CRP and heart rate, but not arterial O2-tension, at admission were significant. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between leucocytes, CRP and heart rate at admission as outcome variables and diagnoses, observation time, baseline hs-cTnT and covariates at hospitalisation as explanatory covariates in separate linear mixed models. A linear mixed model with heart rate as the outcome variable did not converge, even when we log-transformed heart rate. Therefore, in the analysis of heart rate, we replaced the linear mixed model with ordinary least square regression and robust SEs. In these analyses, both leucocytes and CRP were positively related to AECOPD, pneumonia, non-respiratory infections and circulatory diseases, whereas the association between heart rate and diagnoses was not significant (online supplemental table 4).

Finally, we estimated the indirect effect of AECOPD, pneumonia and non-respiratory infection on hs-cTnT as the difference between the total effect and the direct effect: IE=T1 − θ1. SEs were obtained by bootstrapping the difference using 100 replications (online supplemental table 5). Leucocytes and CRP jointly had a significant effect on the ratio between hs-cTnT at hospital admission and hs-cTnT in the stable state, that is, mediated the effect of AECOPD, pneumonia and non-respiratory infections on hs-cTnT. It is likely that this joint effect of CRP and leucocytes is indirect, that is, mediated by some factor(s) that we did not have information about. The joint effects of leucocytes and CRP on the indirect effect of AECOPD and pneumonia on hs-cTnT represented 91% (95% CI 82% to 100%) and 95% (95% CI 83% to 100%) of the total effects, respectively. The corresponding results for non-respiratory infections was 51% (95% CI 36% to 74%). As leucocytes were highly significantly related to circulatory diseases, we also estimated the indirect effect of leucocytes by circulatory diseases. This indirect effect was not significant (p=0.125).


In this study, we found that AECOPD and pneumonia may elevate cTnT indirectly by increasing systemic inflammation. We also found the same effect for non-respiratory infections.

To the best of our knowledge, a positive association between indices of systemic inflammation that is induced by AECOPD or pneumonia, that is, airways inflammation, and myocardial injury has not been described before.

The main strength of this study is that patients were enrolled in stable state, and that diagnoses at hospital admission were made without any knowledge about their state at inclusion. Moreover, in the majority of the patients hospitalised for exacerbation and pneumonia measurements of troponin was available.

Because the association between AECOPD and pneumonia with hs-cTnT attenuated substantially after inclusion of leucocytes and CRP as covariates, one may wonder whether leucocytes and CRP should be regarded as confounders of the relationship between AECOPD and cTnT. However, we think a causal relationship exists between AECOPD and the increase in leucocytes and CRP. Therefore, leucocytes and CRP should be regarded as mediators, not as confounders, of the relationship between AECOPD and troponin elevation.23 24 We think these considerations also encompass pneumonia insofar as the total effect of pneumonia on cTnT elevation was the same as that of AECOPD. The p value for pneumonia was lower than the p value for AECOPD mostly because of fewer pneumonia events relative to AECOPD. Moreover, the distinction between pneumonia and AECOPD in patients with COPD is not clear.

As the increase in leucocytes in AECOPD and pneumonia reflects an effect of airway inflammation on the bone marrow, and the increase in CRP is caused by cytokines produced by circulating granulocytes, we regard the joint effect of leucocytes and CRP in these events as a systemic effect of AECOPD and pneumonia. Furthermore, systemic inflammation may increase cTn, particularly in severe infections.25 This is in agreement with our findings regarding non-respiratory infections. On the other hand, circulatory diseases were weakly associated with leucocytes and CRP, and the cTnT level in this group was nearly unchanged after inclusion of leucocytes and CRP as covariates. Thus, the cTnT elevation was likely a direct consequence of myocardial disease.

The clinical implication of our finding is that reduction of systemic inflammation be given more focus in the treatment of COPD.

Heart rate was also positively associated with troponin elevation, but not with AECOPD or pneumonia, and removal did not change the relationship between AECOPD or pneumonia and troponin. Thus, the confounding effect of heart rate was negligible and it was not a mediator the relationship between AECOPD or pneumonia and troponin.

We also noted that we did not find any association between troponin and hypoxaemia. This is in agreement with two other previous cohorts.26 27 As in our previous studies, we did not have information on oxygen tension in the patients prior to admission. Moreover, it could also be explained by insufficient number of patient. Therefore, we cannot exclude hypoxaemia as a putative contributor of troponin elevation at admission.

Several studies have reported that troponin elevation is associated with the severity of stable COPD and that troponin elevation is associated with an unfavourable prognosis after COPD exacerbation and in the stable state.28 The relationship between AECOPD and increased troponin has been less studied. In a cohort of 98 stable patients with COPD who were followed over several months, 55 patients were investigated in both their stable state and during exacerbation.29 Among these patients, 24 who had verified an infectious cause of the exacerbation had troponin elevation during the exacerbation. This elevation was most pronounced in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease. In another study, a minority of patients referred to hospital due to AECOPD had elevated cTnT that normalised within 72 hours of admission.30 However, in the latter study, they had not determined cTnT values in the stable state prior to hospitalisation. Therefore, they could not adjust for cTnT in the stable state prior to admission.

The main limitation of this study was that we did not re-examine the individuals who were not hospitalised during the follow-up, except the LTOT candidates and members of the outpatient rehabilitation group. Therefore, data about the natural course of cTnT in the cohort were sparse. However, this limitation should not distort the results, as we adjusted for follow-up time in the analyses.

In conclusion, systemic inflammation in COPD caused by exacerbation or pneumonia mediates elevation of cTnT.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. Data are available upon request to the first author.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Regional Ethics committee.


The authors would like to thank the individuals who participated in this study. We also wish to thank Annika Lorentzen, Vigdis Bakkelund, and Hege Kristin Netmangen Larsen of the Department of Research, Division of Medicine, and Akershus University Hospital, for their assistance with the clinical and laboratory procedures.


Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.


  • Contributors VS: design, data managment, analyses, main author; NK: data collection, manuscript preparation; AN: data collection, manuscript preparation; NHH: data collection, manuscript preparation; T-AH: laboratory services, manuscript preparation; TO: design manuscript preparation; GE: design, manuscript preparation.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests TO has served on advisory boards for Abbott Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics and Bayer and has received research support from Abbott Diagnostics, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, Singulex and SomaLogic via Akershus University Hospital, and speaker's or consulting honoraria from Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers and CardiNor, otherwise: none to declare.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.