2 Service review: a comparison of manual vs auto analysis scoring using the NOX T3 limited polysomnographic device

Corey Davies; Lois Attewell; Hannah Hunt; Joelle Smith; Esme Burge; Alex Tuck

doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2021-bssconf.2

Article info

PDF

Abstracts

2 Service review: a comparison of manual vs auto analysis scoring using the NOX T3 limited polysomnographic device

Authors

Corey Davies Cardiff and Vale UHB, Cardiff, UK PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Lois Attewell Cardiff and Vale UHB, Cardiff, UK PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Hannah Hunt Cardiff and Vale UHB, Cardiff, UK PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Joelle Smith Cardiff and Vale UHB, Cardiff, UK PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Esme Burge Cardiff and Vale UHB, Cardiff, UK PubMed articles Google scholar articles
Alex Tuck Cardiff and Vale UHB, Cardiff, UK PubMed articles Google scholar articles

Citation

Davies C, Attewell L, Hunt H, et al

2 Service review: a comparison of manual vs auto analysis scoring using the NOX T3 limited polysomnographic device

BMJ Open Respiratory Research 2021;8:doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-bssconf.2

Publication history

First published November 3, 2021.

Online issue publication

January 10, 2022

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.