TableĀ 3

Diagnostic performance with 95% CI of US-guided FNA SCLN results compared with lung cancer diagnosis made by all other further investigations in the first row (Reference Tests) and compared with the top 3 standard diagnostic reference tests (core LN biopsy, bronchial washings and lung biopsy)

US-guided FNA vsSensitivity % (95% CI)Specificity % (95% CI)PPV % (95% CI)NPV % (95% CI)PLRNLR
All further tests76.9 (63.2 to 87.5)100 (47.9 to 100)100 (91.1 to 100)29.4 (10.4 to 55.9)NA0.23 (0.2 to 0.4)
Core LN biopsy81.2 (59.7 to 94.7)100 (16.6 to 100)100 (81.3 to 100)20 (3.3 to 71.2)NA0.18 (0.1 to 0.5)
Bronchial washings69.2 (38.6 to 90.7)100 (30.5 to 100)100 (66.2 to 100)42.9 (10.4 to 81.3)NA0.3 (0.1 to 0.7)
Lung biopsy57.1 (18.8 to 89.6)100 (16.6 to 100)100 (40.2 to 100)25 (4.1 to 79.7)NA0.4 (0.2 to 1.0)
  • FNA, fine-needle aspiration; NA, not applicable; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; PPV, positive predictive value; SCLN, supraclavicular and cervical lymphadenopathy; US, ultrasound.