Table 5

HFOV compared to usual care for ARDS

Patient or population: adults with ARDS
Settings: intensive care
Intervention: HFOV
Comparison: standard care
OutcomesIllustrative comparative risks (95% CI)Relative effect (95% CI)No. of participants (studies)Quality of evidence (GRADE)Comments
Control riskIntervention risk
Standard careHFOV
Mortality (ICU)308 per 1000442 per 1000
(308 to 447)
RR 1.22
(0.93 to 1.60)
1321
(three studies)
+++-
MODERATE
Due to moderate inconsistency and mild indirectness
Changes in conventional ventilation strategies accounted for heterogeneity
Mortality (30 day)436 per 1000453 per 1000
(362 to 571)
RR 1.04
(0.83 to 1.31)
1580
(five studies)
+++-
MODERATE
Due to moderate inconsistency and mild indirectness
Changes in conventional ventilation strategies accounted for heterogeneity
Adverse events: barotrauma122 per 1000147 per 1000
(101 to 212)
RR 1.205
(0.834 to
1.742)
752
(four studies)
++--
LOW
Due to serious imprecision
Barotrauma variably defined
Adverse events: oxygen failure102 per 100077 per 1000
(61 to 89)
RR 0.557
(0.351 to
0.884)
757
(three studies)
++--
LOW
Due to serious imprecision
Oxygenation failure variably defined.
  • ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; HFOV, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.