MPM diagnostic process | ||||
No | Yes | X², p value | Total | |
Was the explanation of the mesothelioma diagnosis understandable | 176 | 283 | (1)=1.548, 0.257 | 459 |
38.30% | 61.70% | |||
(44.4% women, 37.1% men) | ||||
Was the explanation given in sensitive way | 126 | 332 | (1)=0.638, 0.681 | 458 |
Sensitivity | 27.50% | 72.50% | ||
(29.6% women, 26.7% men) | ||||
Were you told that a multidisciplinary team had reviewed your case. | 106 | 250 | (1)=1.498, 0.148 | 356 |
29.80% | 70.20% | |||
(32.7% women, 22.3% men) | ||||
Did healthcare professionals have sufficient knowledge and know enough about your condition | 115 | 344 | (1)=0.786, 0.778 | 459 |
Knowledge | 25.10% | 74.90% | ||
(26.3% women, 24.7% men) | ||||
Did you receive good support from your GP in relation to your diagnosis | 252 | 199 | (1)=0.675, 0.727 | 451 |
GP support | 55.90% | 44.10% | ||
(54.8% women, 55.1%) | ||||
Were you overall satisfied with healthcare professionals during your diagnosis | 92 | 364 | (1)=0.845, 0.857 | 456 |
Overall satisfaction | 20.20% | 79.80% | ||
(21.5% women and 19.8% men) |
GP, general practitioner; MPM, malignant pleural mesothelioma.