Regular Article
Efficacy and Tolerability of Levodropropizine in Adult Patients with Non-productive Cough. Comparison with Dextromethorphan

https://doi.org/10.1006/pupt.1997.0083Get rights and content

Abstract

The results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial involving 209 adult patients of either sex with moderate non-productive cough are reported. The therapeutic efficacy and the tolerability of levodropropizine syrup (60 mg t.i.d. for 5 days) was evaluated in comparison with dextromethorphan syrup (15 mg t.i.d. for 5 days). Efficacy was assessed by the number of coughing spells in a 6 h period, the cough frequency classes, the cough intensity and the night awakenings due to cough. Tolerability was evaluated by laboratory results, vital signs and any adverse event occurred during the clinical trial, including presence or absence of somnolence. Independently from the underlying pathology and from the degree of baseline cough severity, the number of coughing spells was significantly (P<0.05) reduced by both levodropropizine and dextromethorphan already after the 2nd day of treatment, the effect and its time of onset being similar for both drugs. Cough intensity was significantly (P<0.01) reduced by both drugs throughout the treatment, at an earlier time with levodropropizine than with dextromethorphan. Concurrently with the relief of cough, the number of night awakenings was decreased remarkably and significantly (P<0.05), with levodropropizine displaying an improvement significantly higher (P<0.05) than dextromethorphan. No change in laboratory tests values was considered clinically relevant and vital signs were not clinically affected by the study drugs. The number of patients reporting adverse events was significantly higher (P<0.05) in the dextromethorphan (12.1%) than in the levodropropizine (3.6%) group. Overall, somnolence was reported for a low percentage of patients with both drugs, with the percentage of patients experiencing this side effect being one half in the group treated with levodropropizine (4.6%) as compared with dextromethorphan (10.4%). These results confirm the antitussive effectiveness of levodropropizine and point out a more favourable benefit/risk profile when compared to dextromethorphan.

References (0)

Cited by (48)

  • Green and inventive fluorescence approach for levodropropizine determination in human plasma

    2024, Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
  • Antitussive therapy: A role for levodropropizine

    2019, Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, levodropropizine, a peripherally acting antitussive drug, has a good tolerability and safety profile. Levodropropizine has been demonstrated to show equivalent efficacy and less sedative effects compared to other antitussive agents such as the centrally acting cough suppressants dextromethorphan or dihydrocodeine [6,7]. Levodropropizine-containing products, for adults and children older than 2 years for the symptomatic therapy of cough, are approved for use in many countries in syrup, oral drop or tablet form.

  • Cough

    2015, Murray and Nadel's Textbook of Respiratory Medicine: Volume 1,2, Sixth Edition
  • Efficacy of levodropropizine in pediatric cough

    2012, Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Given its demonstrated antitussive efficacy and safety in adults [22–26], and the encouraging data supporting its efficacy and safety in children [27–31], levodropropizine appears to be an appropriate candidate for further evaluation as a potential antitussive for the pediatric population.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This clinical study was supported by Dompé farmaceutici s.p.a.

View full text