Review
Concepts of normality applied to the measurement of lung function

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(86)90678-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Lung function testing has become an integral part of the clinical assessment of pulmonary disease. However, increasing application of such testing in research into the origins of disease as well as in the assessment of health raises the issue of what is meant by normal respiratory function. In essence, this depends on the sources of variation in lung function measurements that are of interest (the signal) and those that are not (the noise). For instance, clinicians are primarily interested in variation due to disease, all other sources of variation being considered noise. Physiologists are concerned with sources of variation other than disease, and the interest of epidemiologists (and their definition of normality) varies according to the specific objectives of each particular study, report or program. Consideration of the sources of variation in lung function (within a subject, between subjects, and between populations) not only is useful in clarifying the concepts of normality for clinical application, physiologic studies, and epidemiologic purposes, but also is mandatory for an understanding of lung function in the transition between health and disease, a major thrust in all three areas of endeavour.

References (60)

  • EJM Campbell et al.

    The concept of disease

    Br Med J

    (1979)
  • American Thoracic Society

    Guidelines as to what constitutes an adverse respiratory health effect, with special reference to air pollution

    Am Thorac Soc News

    (1984)
  • GA Diamond et al.

    Application of information theory to clinical diagnostic testing

    Circulation

    (1981)
  • AL Cochrane

    The history of the measurement of ill-health

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1972)
  • WGB Graham et al.

    Pulmonary function loss in Vermont granite workers: a long term follow-up and critical appraisal

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1981)
  • BG Ferris

    Epidemiology standardization project

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1978)
  • MR Becklake et al.

    The N2 closing volume test in population studies: sources of variation and reproducibility

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1975)
  • S Ducic et al.

    Appraisal of a new test: between-technician variation In the measurement of closing volume

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1975)
  • GL Snider et al.

    Variation in the measurement of spirograms

    Am J Med Sci

    (1967)
  • JA Leech et al.

    Respiratory pressures and function in young adults

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1983)
  • BG Nickerson et al.

    Within-subject variability and percent change for significance of spirometry in normal subjects and patients with cystic fibrosis

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1980)
  • WH Perks et al.

    Effects of temperature on Vitalograph spirometer readings

    Thorax

    (1983)
  • AC Pincock et al.

    The effect of temperature on recording spirograms

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1983)
  • RM Gardner

    ATS Statement

  • ATS Committee on proficiency standards for clinical pulmonary laboratories

    Pulmonary function laboratory personnel standards

    Am Thorac Soc News

    (1982)
  • RM Gardner et al.

    Evaluating commercially available spirometers

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1980)
  • JE Diem et al.

    Five year longitudinal study of workers employed in a new toluene diisocyanate manufacturing plant

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1982)
  • E Eisen et al.

    Effect of selection in a prospective study of forced expiratory volume in Vermont granite workers

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1983)
  • Cited by (80)

    • Environmental Determinants of Lung Aging

      2014, The Lung: Development, Aging and the Environment: Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada.

    1

    Dr. Becklake is a Career Scientist of the Medical Research Council (Canada).

    View full text