Article
Short-stay comprehensive inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation for advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90132-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of short-term, comprehensive inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Design: Retrospective analysis of several outcome measures.

Setting: Inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation unit.

Participants: Thirty-eight consecutive adult patients with advanced COPD referred to our inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program between January 1 and December 31, 1994. All but one were referred from acute care hospitals. The mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was .69L; 79% required supplemental oxygen.

Main Outcome Measures: (1) Discharge status; (2) timed walk, with measurements of distance and exertional dyspnea; and (3) functional status.

Results: All patients were able to be discharged home after a mean length of stay of 9.9 days. The 12-minute walk distance increased by 66%, from 416 ± 282 feet to 690 ± 337 feet (p < .001). Dyspnea during the walk testing also improved: the resting score decreased from 2.87 to .97, the 6-minute score from 7.84 to 3.05, and postwalk score from 8.53 to 3.51 (all p < .001). All patients showed improvement in the Pulmonary Function Status Scale (PFSS), with the functional activities subsection increasing by 39%, the dyspnea score by 65%, and psychosocial score by 35% (all p < .001).

Conclusion: Short-term improvement in multiple areas can be accomplished with comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation of short duration. This is particularly relevant to the current health care environment that dictates shorter in-hospital lengths of stay.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (27)

  • Measurement of activities of daily living in patients with COPD : A systematic review

    2014, Chest
    Citation Excerpt :

    Twenty-seven ADLs instruments were identified, of which 11 instruments were respiratory disease-specific, and 16 were generic (Table 3). The most commonly included respiratory disease-specific instruments were Functional Performance Inventory (FPI), Pulmonary Functional Status Scale (PFSS), and Modified Pulmonary Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire (PFSDQ-M).92,93,98–100,103–109,111,115 The most frequently included generic instruments were the Barthel index, the Katz Activities of Daily Living scale, the Lawton and Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale, and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living index.

  • Pulmonary rehabilitation: Joint ACCP/AACVPR Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    2007, Chest
    Citation Excerpt :

    From the patient's perspective, the optimal duration should be that which produces maximal effects in the individual without becoming burdensome. Significant gains in exercise tolerance, dyspnea, and HRQOL have been observed following inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programs as short as 10 days60 and after outpatient programs as long as 18 months.61 Shorter program duration has the potential to reduce the cost per patient served and to spread limited resources.62

  • An evaluation of two approaches to exercise conditioning in pulmonary rehabilitation

    2002, Chest
    Citation Excerpt :

    Higher scores indicate greater functional performance. Two uncontrolled studies have suggested that the PFSS is responsive to pulmonary rehabilitation intervention. 13,17 Dyspnea associated with daily activities was measured using the baseline dyspnea index (BDI) and the transitional dyspnea indexes (TDI).18

  • Benefits of an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program: A prospective analysis

    2001, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    The effects of a pulmonary rehabilitation program on supplemental oxygen use has been examined in few studies. Votto et al10 found that 50% of patients on oxygen at admission to an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program did not require supplemental oxygen at discharge. In our study, we had similar and even more striking findings, as we delineated between daytime and nighttime use.

View all citing articles on Scopus

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

View full text