Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: A comparison of two techniques

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00206-5Get rights and content

Abstract

We have developed a method for estimating the minimally important difference (MID) for health status measures. Whereas the conventional approach requires patients to judge themselves relative to their memories, our method requires patients to judge themselves relative to others with the same condition. In this study we examined whether our method (based on between-patient differences) and the conventional method (based on within-patient changes) provides comparable estimates of the MID for one health status measure: the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who were participating in a supervised respiratory rehabilitation program were included if they were in stable health (n = 112). Their mean score per question in the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire was 4.5 (range, 1 to 7; where bigger values indicate better health). Our method estimated that the MID was 0.5 (95% confidence interval 0.4 to 0.7). This estimate was similar to the MID previously found using the conventional method. These observations support the role of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire for measuring patient's symptoms, the validity of our approach for assessing the MID, and an estimate on the order of 0.5 as the threshold for this particular health status measure.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (325)

  • Outcome Measurement for Distal Radius Fractures

    2021, Hand Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    By design, it is specific for outcome measurement of wrist conditions, which renders it among the most commonly used tools for DRF outcome measurement.25,27,44 The extensive investigation of the PRWE also includes an established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 11.5 points, specifically for DRFs, which assists researchers in determining the clinical relevance of their findings.46,47 Finally, the PRWE correlates with other well-established PROMs for DRFs, such as the DASH as well as VAS pain scores.25,48

View all citing articles on Scopus

This project was funded through an Ontario Career Scientist award to Dr. Redelmeier and by grants from the Ontario Thoracic Society, the National Cancer Institute of Canada, and the West Park Hospital Foundation.

View full text