Chest
Volume 146, Issue 3, September 2014, Pages 813-834
Journal home page for Chest

Special Features
Entrustable Professional Activities and Curricular Milestones for Fellowship Training in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine: Report of a Multisociety Working Group

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-0710Get rights and content

This article describes the curricular milestones and entrustable professional activities for trainees in pulmonary, critical care, or combined fellowship programs. Under the Next Accreditation System of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), curricular milestones compose the curriculum or learning objectives for training in these fields. Entrustable professional activities represent the outcomes of training, the activities that society and professional peers can expect fellowship graduates to be able to perform unsupervised. These curricular milestones and entrustable professional activities are the products of a consensus process from a multidisciplinary committee of medical educators representing the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST), the American Thoracic Society, the Society of Critical Care Medicine, and the Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors. After consensus was achieved using the Delphi process, the document was revised with input from the sponsoring societies and program directors. The resulting lists can serve as a roadmap and destination for trainees, program directors, and educators. Together with the reporting milestones, they will help mark trainees' progress in the mastery of the six ACGME core competencies of graduate medical education.

Section snippets

Background

The ACGME is responsible to the public for the accreditation of residency and fellowship training programs, whereas the ABIM is responsible for certifying the competence of individual trainees in internal medicine and its subspecialties. The ACGME is implementing what has been termed the Next Accreditation System (NAS). The NAS constitutes a comprehensive revision of the methods for accreditation of medical training programs, and of how the educational progress of individual trainees is

Methods

To achieve consensus on these EPAs and CMs, a working group was convened in March 2013. Membership was composed of two members each from the Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors (APCCMPD), the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST), the Society of Critical Care Medicine, and the American Thoracic Society. In addition to having clinical expertise in their respective fields, all members had significant experience as program directors of internal medicine

Results

Consensus on all items was achieved in three or fewer rounds of Delphi voting. Because our in-person meeting facilitated active discussion and revision, only a single round of voting was required for the medical knowledge and patient care competencies, despite their length. Our final proposed EPAs for pulmonary medicine and critical care medicine are each shown separately inTable 1.Table 2 lists the EPAs for combined programs in pulmonary and critical care.Table 3 lists the CMs for the four

Discussion

Using a formal process and with input from our professional societies and program directors, we have developed a list of CMs and EPAs for pulmonary medicine and critical care medicine. These documents serve several important goals. For the public, the EPAs provide a succinct summary of what subspecialists in our field can do and specify what trainees must be able to perform independently to ensure public trust. For trainees, the EPAs serve as a set of goals and reminders of what they must

Acknowledgments

Financial/NONFINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: The authors have reported to CHEST that no potential conflicts of interest exist with any companies/organizations whose products or services may be discussed in this article.

Other contributions: The authors are extremely grateful for the administrative support from Joyce Bruno, MBA, MIPH, and Laura Nolan from the Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors, and Sharon Plenner, BS, from the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

References (18)

  • ML Green et al.

    Charting the road to competence: developmental milestones for internal medicine residency training

    J Grad Med Educ

    (2009)
  • O ten Cate et al.

    Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice?

    Acad Med

    (2007)
  • KE Hauer et al.

    Developing entrustable professional activities as the basis for assessment of competence in an internal medicine residency: a feasibility study

    J Gen Intern Med

    (2013)
  • TJ Nasca et al.

    The next GME accreditation system—rationale and benefits

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • KJ Caverzagie et al.

    The internal medicine reporting milestones and the next accreditation system

    Ann Intern Med

    (2013)
  • PJ Hicks et al.

    Pediatrics milestone project: next steps toward meaningful outcomes assessment

    J Grad Med Educ

    (2010)
  • PJ Hicks et al.

    The pediatrics milestones: conceptual framework, guiding principles, and approach to development

    J Grad Med Educ

    (2010)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (81)

  • Setting up a Pleural Disease Service

    2021, Clinics in Chest Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Increasingly in postgraduate education, “Entrustable Professional Activities” (EPAs) are being used as an assessment tool to recognize procedural independence.34 They are widely used in pulmonary and critical care programs in the United States.62 TUS and pleural procedural competency are well suited to have an EPA approach underpinning training and competence assessments.

  • Development of undergraduate nursing entrustable professional activities to enhance clinical care and practice

    2020, Nurse Education Today
    Citation Excerpt :

    With respect to the American Association of American Medical College's Core EPAs for Entering Residency, American medical schools have tested EPAs as potential frameworks to assess competencies (Englander et al., 2016). Furthermore, other specialties that had developed EPAs and tested them as potential models for competency assessments include nephrology (Yuan et al., 2014), emergency medicine (Beeson et al., 2014), internal medicine (Caverzagie et al., 2015), and pulmonary and critical care medicine (Fessler et al., 2014). Additionally, EPAs for care continuity (Ng and Ng, 2014) and patient-centered medical homes (Chang et al., 2013) have been considered and developed.

  • Design of an entrustable professional activity for adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

    2020, Surgery Open Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Graduate medical education is undergoing a gradual and accelerating transformation to competency-based assessment, with the recognition that trainees need to exercise increasing levels of autonomy through their education trajectory to be prepared to appropriately care for patients at the completion of their programs. Entrustable professional activities are increasingly prevalent; they are being pilot-tested for undergraduate medical education [17,18] and are being used in a variety of graduate medical education programs [19–23]. As an educator, one must balance granting an appropriate level of trainee autonomy with patient safety concerns, ideally granting the learner just enough autonomy to permit a safe struggle in the learner's zone of proximal development [24].

View all citing articles on Scopus

*Dr Addrizzo-Harris and Dr Buckley for the American College of Chest Physicians; Dr Beck and Dr Rowley for the American Thoracic Society; Dr Pastores and Dr Spevetz for the Society of Critical Care Medicine; Dr Fessler and Dr Piquette for the Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors.

Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians. See online for more details.

View full text