Who should follow up lung cancer patients after operation?

Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Jun;69(6):1696-700. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01145-0.

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether follow-up by a thoracic surgeon after lung cancer resection alters survival.

Methods: The charts of 245 early stage (< or = IIB) non-small cell lung cancer patients, diagnosed between 1988 and 1995, were reviewed. Follow-up data were complete to January 1, 1997, in 96.3% (236 of 245) of cases.

Results: Ninety of the 111 recurrences were detected before discharge from the thoracic clinic. Despite clinic follow-up, 66.7% (60 of 90) were identified by the family physician, and only 28.9% (26 of 90) by the surgeon. The remaining 4.4% (4 of 90) were detected by other physicians. Ninety-six percent (25 of 26) surgeon-detected recurrences had suspicious clinical or chest radiographic findings, compared with 92% for family physician-detected recurrences (55 of 60; not significant). The cost per recurrence detected by surgeons was Can $4,367. A 75% cost savings could ensure if patients were followed up by their family physician. There was no 5-year survival benefit for patients whose recurrence was detected by the surgeon.

Conclusions: Long-term follow-up after limited-stage non-small cell lung cancer resection could possibly be performed by a family physician alone without compromising overall survival, and with significant cost savings.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aftercare / economics*
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Family Practice
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hospital Costs
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms / economics
  • Lung Neoplasms / mortality
  • Lung Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / economics
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / mortality
  • Ontario
  • Patient Care Team / economics*
  • Postoperative Complications / economics*
  • Postoperative Complications / mortality
  • Survival Rate