Article Text

Serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 following non-hospitalised infection: clinical and ethnodemographic features associated with the magnitude of the antibody response
  1. Adrian M Shields1,
  2. Sian E Faustini1,
  3. Marisol Perez-Toledo2,
  4. Sian Jossi2,
  5. Joel D Allen3,
  6. Saly Al-Taei1,
  7. Claire Backhouse1,
  8. Lynsey A Dunbar1,
  9. Daniel Ebanks1,
  10. Beena Emmanuel1,
  11. Aduragbemi A Faniyi4,
  12. Mark Garvey5,6,
  13. Annabel Grinbergs5,
  14. Golaleh McGinnell5,
  15. Joanne O'Neill5,
  16. Yasunori Watanabe3,7,
  17. Max Crispin3,
  18. David C Wraith2,
  19. Adam F Cunningham8,
  20. Mark T Drayson1 and
  21. Alex G Richter1
  1. 1Department of Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  3. 3School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  4. 4Birmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  5. 5University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
  6. 6Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  7. 7Oxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  8. 8MRC Centre for Immune Regulation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Prof Alex G Richter; a.g.richter{at}bham.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective To determine clinical and ethnodemographic correlates of serological responses against the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein following mild-to-moderate COVID-19.

Design A retrospective cohort study of healthcare workers who had self-isolated due to COVID-19.

Setting University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK (UHBFT).

Participants 956 healthcare workers were recruited by open invitation via UHBFT trust email and social media between 27 April 2020 and the 8 June 2020.

Intervention Participants volunteered a venous blood sample that was tested for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein antibodies. Results were interpreted in the context of the symptoms of their original illness and ethnodemographic variables.

Results Using an assay that simultaneously measures the combined IgG, IgA and IgM response against the spike glycoprotein (IgGAM), the overall seroprevalence within this cohort was 46.2% (n=442/956). The seroprevalence of immunoglobulin isotypes was 36.3%, 18.7% and 8.1% for IgG, IgA and IgM, respectively. IgGAM identified serological responses in 40.6% (n=52/128) of symptomatic individuals who reported a negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. Increasing age, non-white ethnicity and obesity were independently associated with greater IgG antibody response against the spike glycoprotein. Self-reported fever and fatigue were associated with greater IgG and IgA responses against the spike glycoprotein. The combination of fever and/or cough and/or anosmia had a positive predictive value of 92.3% for seropositivity in self-isolating individuals a time when Wuhan strain SARS-CoV-2 was predominant.

Conclusions and relevance Assays employing combined antibody detection demonstrate enhanced seroepidemiological sensitivity and can detect prior viral exposure even when PCR swabs have been negative. We demonstrate an association between known ethnodemographic risk factors associated with mortality from COVID-19 and the magnitude of serological responses in mild-to-moderate disease.

  • respiratory infection
  • clinical epidemiology
  • COVID-19

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. The anonymised dataset will be made available on reasonable request. Proposals should be directed to the corresponding author.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. The anonymised dataset will be made available on reasonable request. Proposals should be directed to the corresponding author.

View Full Text

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @immunologydoc

  • AMS and SEF contributed equally.

  • Contributors AS and SEF helped conceive the study, performed experiments, collated and analysed the data, produced the figures, wrote and revised the manuscript and should be considered joint first authors. MP-T and SJ performed experiments, collated and analysed the data. JDA, YW and MC produced the original trimeric spike-glycoprotein on which the serological assays are based and advised on methodology. AG, GM and JO'N recruited participants to the study, facilitated the acquisition of clinical samples and collated study results. MIG collated and interpreted trust-level data on infections within UHBFT inpatients. SAT, CB, LD, DE, BE and AF processed samples, undertook experiments and collated results for serological studies. MG provided trust inpatient data. DCW, AFC and MTD helped conceive the study and supervised analysis of data from the study. AGR is the senior and corresponding author for this manuscript and provided overall leadership for all aspects of the study. All authors helped revise the manuscript for publication.

  • Funding This paper presents independent research supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust and the University of Birmingham (Grant Reference Number BRC-1215-20009). The authors are grateful for funding from the UK Department of Health and Social Care, UKRI and UK CIC, as part of the PITCH Consortium, the Global Challenges Research Fund and The Institute for Global Innovation of the University of Birmingham, and the UK Medical Research Council (Grant Reference Number MC_PC_17183). The work in Professor Max Crispin’s laboratory was funded by the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) through grant INV-008352/OPP1153692 and the IAVI Neutralizing Antibody Center through the Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery grant OPP1196345/INV-008813, both funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases through the Scripps Consortium for HIV Vaccine Development (CHAVD) (AI144462); and the University of Southampton Coronavirus Response Fund.

  • Competing interests MTD reports personal fees from Abingdon Health, outside the submitted work.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.