Background Dietary nitrate supplementation, usually in the form of beetroot juice, may improve exercise performance and endothelial function. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish whether this approach has beneficial effects in people with respiratory disease.
Methods A systematic search of records up to March 2021 was performed on PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane and Embase to retrieve clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of dietary nitrate supplementation on cardiovascular parameters and exercise capacity in chronic respiratory conditions. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts of potential studies and performed the data extraction.
Results After full-text review of 67 papers, eleven (two randomised controlled trials and nine crossover trials) involving 282 participants met the inclusion criteria. Three were single dose; seven short term; and one, the largest (n=122), done in the context of pulmonary rehabilitation. Pooled analysis showed that dietary nitrate supplementation reduced systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP and mean arterial pressure (mean difference (95% CI), −3.39 mm Hg (−6.79 to 0.01); p=0.05 and –2.20 mm Hg (−4.36 to −0.03); p=0.05 and −4.40 mm Hg (−7.49 to −1.30); p=0.005, respectively). It was associated with increased walk distance in the context of pulmonary rehabilitation (standardised mean difference (95% CI), 0.47 (0.11 to 0.83), p=0.01), but no effect was identified in short-term studies (0.08 (−0.32 to 0.49).
Conclusion Dietary nitrate supplementation may have a beneficial effect on BP and augment the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on exercise capacity. Short-term studies do not suggest a consistent benefit on exercise capacity.
PROSPERO registration number CRD42019130123.
- pulmonary rehabilitation
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Why read on?
This review systematically evaluates the available evidence regarding the impact of dietary nitrate supplementation on exercise capacity and cardiovascular parameters in individuals with respiratory disease.
Exercise limitation is a common feature in individuals with chronic respiratory disease (CRD) despite optimum medical treatment including pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and pharmacotherapy.1–3 Factors contributing to breathlessness and reduced physical activity include altered pulmonary mechanics and cardiovascular function as well as skeletal muscle impairment.4–7 Nitric oxide (NO) is a ubiquitous signalling molecule with a key role in endothelial function, and a relationship between plasma nitrite (NO2-) levels and exercise performance has been identified.8 9 Dietary NO3- supplementation, which increases NO availability via a NO3-–NO2-–NO pathway, has therefore been proposed as a potential complementary approach to improve exercise capacity in people with cardiorespiratory disease.
In healthy adults, endurance exercise capacity increases following dietary NO3- supplementation10 11 and evidence suggests that NO3- supplementation with beetroot juice (BRJ) can reduce oxygen consumption (VO2) during submaximal exercise and increase the time to reach exhaustion during high-intensity training.12–14 Of note, dietary NO3- supplementation has been shown to improve exercise performance under hypoxic conditions,15 and there is evidence for an effect in some clinical conditions, for example, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),16–19 peripheral vascular disease20 and heart failure.21 22
In addition to exercise limitation, vascular comorbidities are common in people with lung disease, and clinical guidelines highlight the need to identify and optimally treat them.23 If dietary NO3- supplementation can be shown to have a beneficial effect on exercise capacity and/or vascular comorbidities, it has the potential to improve outcomes in this patient group.
We therefore aimed to evaluate the available evidence regarding the impact of NO3- supplementation on exercise capacity and cardiovascular parameters in individuals with respiratory disease.
The review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database. It was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
The first author (ASA) searched PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane and Embase from inception to March 2021. The terms used in this search were ‘respiratory diseases’, ‘chronic obstructive pulmonary disease’, ‘COPD’, ‘chronic obstructive airways disease’, ‘emphysema’, ‘bronchitis’, ‘bronchiectasis’, ‘interstitial lung disease’, ‘ILD’, ‘cystic fibrosis’, ‘pulmonary hypertension’, ‘PHT’, ‘nitrate’, ‘beetroot’, ‘dietary nitrate’ and ‘nitrate supplementation’. A search filter was applied by using medical subject heading terms. This search strategy was conducted in collaboration with a librarian to ensure this review contained the appropriate and necessary keywords. Full search strategy from all databases is presented in online supplemental appendix 1.
We included both randomised clinical trials and crossover studies.
The PICO format was used in our search strategy
P: Population included adults diagnosed with CRD such as COPD, interstitial lung disease (ILD), bronchiectasis or pulmonary hypertension (PHT) either undergoing usual care or taking part in PR.
I: Intervention was dietary NO3- supplementation delivered to patients with CRD.
C: Comparator was a placebo group for interventional studies.
O: Outcomes included both primary outcomes (exercise capacity and blood pressure) and secondary outcomes such as cardiovascular parameters: heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (O2 sat), plasma NO3- and NO2- levels, peak and iso-time VO2, endothelial function (flow-mediated dilatation (FMD)) and fractional exhaled NO (FeNO).
Studies examining children under 18 years.
Any papers written in a language other than English.
Conference abstracts or unpublished data.
Data were extracted into a standardised Microsoft Excel spreadsheet form (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). We contacted the corresponding authors for missing data. Two authors (ASA and AMA) independently screened titles and abstracts of potential studies. A third reviewer (NSH) was available to resolve any disagreements. The form included data about change in exercise capacity following dietary NO3- supplementation. Other data such as cardiovascular parameters (HR, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and O2 sat), VO2, FMD, FeNO, intervention protocol (eg, dose, duration and delivery method), exercise protocol (type and duration) and placebo were extracted.
The synthesis of results described the outcomes of interest, such as exercise capacity, VO2, exercise endurance time, plasma NO3- level, plasma NO2- level, FeNO, SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, O2 sat and FMD. Where appropriate, meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled differences and 95% CIs in the outcomes of interests between NO3- and placebo conditions. For crossover studies, endpoint values were extracted from the end of the study after receiving the supplements (NO3- or placebo) and included in meta-analysis as if from a parallel designed trial.24 25 The random-effect model was applied because of the variety in several factors (eg, exercise protocol, dose and duration of NO3- supplementation). Continuous data are reported as the mean difference (MD) (Δ). Standardised mean difference (SMD) was used when the same outcome was assessed with different measures (eg, exercise capacity assessed using different walking tests). Heterogeneity among included studies was evaluating using the I2 value. The statistical analyses were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s Review Manager software (RevMan V.5.4.0).
Selection of studies
Initially, 2113 articles were identified through the database searches, 1554 after removing duplicates with 67 articles eligible for full-text review following title and abstract screening. Following full-text review, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria for the present systematic review (figure 1).
Among the 11 randomised controlled trials (RCT), two used a parallel design, and nine used a crossover design. All 11 were published between 2015 and 2020. Eight studies were conducted in Europe, two in the USA and one in Australia. Studies were categorised based on the reported duration of NO3- supplementation as ‘acute effect’ (single dose of NO3- supplementation, 2.5–3 hours before exercise session) (n=3), ‘short term’ (less than 3 months in usual care) (n=7) or ‘during pulmonary rehabilitation’ (n=1). One study provided both acute effect and short-term data.26 The total number of participants was 282, including 15 with pulmonary arterial hypertension27 and 267 with COPD16–19 26 28–32 with sample sizes ranging from 8 to 122. Age of participants (mean±SD) was 66±3 years, and the majority (57%) were men. Ten trials used BRJ as the source of NO3- (n=10), and one used sodium NO3- (NaNO3-).26 The dose of NO3- used ranged from 6.45 mmol28 to 16 mmol27. A full description of the included studies is presented in table 1.
Data on exercise capacity or endurance were reported in ten studies using different tests including the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) (n=3), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) (n=3), endurance time during cycle ergometry (n=3) and endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT) (n=1) in individuals with COPD16–19 26 29–32 and PHT.27
The impact of NO3- supplementation on peak exercise capacity measured using walking tests (ISWT and 6MWD) in people with COPD is shown in (figure 2). Pooled analysis from five trials demonstrated an improvement in exercise capacity following NO3- supplementation compared with placebo (SMD (95% CI), 0.30 (0.03 to 0.57), p=0.03),17–19 30 32 although this effect was driven by the study in the context of PR. Thus, supplementation was associated with increased walk distance in the context of PR (SMD (95% CI), 0.47 (0.11 to 0.83), p=0.01), but no effect was identified in short-term studies (0.08 (−0.32 to 0.49). A single trial in 15 patients with PHT taking BRJ for 1 week did not show a significant effect on 6MWD.27
Berry et al found an improvement in endurance exercise capacity during cycle ergometry at 75% maximal workload.16 In contrast, results from two trials providing NO3- supplementation (one using BRJ and one NaNO3-) did not demonstrate a significant improvement in endurance exercise time during cycle ergometry.26 29
Similarly, Leong et al investigated the effect of 3 days of BRJ on exercise endurance via ESWT at 85% VO2 max, among patients with stable moderate COPD, and found no difference in exercise endurance following BRJ compared with placebo.31
Effect of NO3- supplementation on physiological and cardiovascular parameters
The impact of NO3- supplementation on peak VO2 was reported in six studies (figure 3).16 26–30 Pooled analysis from four trials demonstrated that peak VO2 did not change following NO3- supplementation compared with placebo (MD (95% CI), 0.09 mL/min/kg (−1.36 to 1.53), p=0.91).16 26 28 29 However, VO2 at iso-time was reported in two studies; Curtis et al report a significant decrease in iso-time VO2 after NO3- supplementation compared with a placebo (BRJ 16.6±6.0 mL/min/kg; placebo 17.2±6.0 mL/min/kg; p=0.043).29 Differently, Berry et al failed to find lower iso-time oxygen uptake (median+IQR; BRJ 14.1+5.4; placebo 13.4+5.5; p=0.099).16 We were unable to perform a meta-analysis of iso-time oxygen uptake due to incomplete data. Iso-time VO2 and other cardiopulmonary exercise parameters are provided in (table 2).
SBP and DBP were reported in all included studies, while MAP was reported in three studies.17 19 29 Meta-analysis for systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure in people with COPD found significant reductions compared with placebo (figure 4) (MD (95% CI) was −3.39 mm Hg (−6.79 to 0.01), p=0.05, for SBP; −2.20 mm Hg (−4.36 to −0.03), p=0.05, for DBP; and −4.40 mm Hg (−7.49 to −1.30), p=0.005, for mean arterial blood pressure).16–19 26 28–32 However, in one study in individuals with PHT, SBP and DBP did not significantly change following NO3- supplementation compared with placebo.27
The impact of NO3- supplementation on HR was reported in seven studies.16 17 26–30 Pooled analysis from four trials of HR at rest and at peak of exercise in people with COPD is shown in figure 5. Following the meta-analysis, the MD (95% CI) was 0.23 (−3.58 to 4.03), p=0.91, for HR at rest and 0.22 (−5.80 to 6.24), p=0.94, for HR at peak of exercise, showing no change in HR following NO3- supplementation compared with placebo.17 26 28 29
Pavitt et al assessed the impact of NO3- supplementation during PR on endothelial function using brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation,19 finding an improvement (increase) in FMD in the treatment group (n=10) compared with placebo (n=10) (median (IQR) percent change: +6.6% (0.6 to 17.6), placebo: −4.7% (−21.5 to 11.8), and estimated treatment effect: −20.3% (95% CI −33.8 to 3.4); p=0.046).
The impact of dietary NO3- supplementation on O2 sat was reported in three studies.16 17 29 Pooled analysis from two trials for oxygen saturation at rest and at peak exercise in COPD is shown in figure 6.The MD (95% CI) was 0.20 (−1.72 to 2.12)%, p=0.84, for oxygen saturation at rest and −0.37 (−2.88 to 2.14)%, p=0.77, for oxygen saturation at peak of exercise, showing no effect on oxygen saturation following NO3- supplementation compared with placebo.17 29 Curtis et al did demonstrate a reduction in area under the curve for oxygen saturation during exercise with NO3- supplementation compared with placebo.29 Of note, this study excluded individuals with resting hypoxia.
Plasma NO3- and NO2- levels
Plasma NO3- and NO2- levels were measured in seven studies.16–18 26 27 29 32 Pooled analysis from six trials for plasma NO3- and NO2- levels in COPD individuals is shown in figure 7. Following the meta-analysis, the MD (95% CI) was 445.61 (254.69 to 636.53), p<0.00001, for plasma NO3- level and 367.07 (232.87 to 501.27), p<0.00001, for plasma NO2- level, showing that levels of plasma NO3- and NO2- significantly increased following NO3- supplementation compared with placebo.16–18 26 29 32
Fractional exhaled NO
The impact of NO3- supplementation on FeNO was measured in three trials two conducted in individuals with COPD18 28 and one with PHT.27 Pooled analysis from two trials for FeNO in COPD individuals is shown in figure 8. Following the meta-analysis, the MD (95% CI) was 17.23 (−3.35 to 37.80) ppb, p=0.10, for FeNO, showing no consistent effect on FeNO following NO3- supplementation compared with placebo.18 28 However, Henrohn et al (2018) found that the level of FeNO in individuals with PHT increased at all flow rates (50–300 mL/s) following NO3- supplementation compared with placebo, at a flow rate of 50 mL/s (median of differences 18, 95% CI 11 to 26, p<0.0010).27
Risk of bias and evidence quality assessment
Using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool,33 the included studies showed considerable variation in the risk of bias, but most were limited by a lack of allocation concealment, blinding and incomplete reporting of data (figure 9).
The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE)34 criteria were used to assess the overall evidence around specific outcomes (eg, exercise capacity and blood pressure endpoints). For exercise capacity, the majority of studies were small and short term, which limit the precision of estimates. Studies did not focus clearly on disease severity, limiting the directness of the evidence to COPD phenotypes, particularly hypoxic patients. Further, studies used a variety of interventions (eg, doses, duration and delivery method) and outcome measures contributing to heterogeneity or inconsistency. Therefore, the quality of evidence by GRADE to support an effect of NO3- supplementation on exercise capacity in people with lung disease is low. In the specific context of PR, only a single high-quality RCT, the largest and the longest of the included studies, was identified. Therefore, the total evidence by GRADE to support the impact of NO3- supplementation on exercise capacity in the context of PR is moderate. Regarding blood pressure endpoints, studies were consistent, although the longest duration study is only 8 weeks, so taken together, the evidence to support an impact of NO3- supplementation on blood pressure is moderate.
The main findings of this review into the effects of dietary NO3- supplementation in people with CRD are that, although it can augment the effects of PR on exercise performance, a consistent short-term effect on exercise capacity in the absence of exercise training has not so far been demonstrated. However, studies to date do suggest that dietary NO3- supplementation can lower blood pressure, perhaps by improving endothelial function, which is potentially important given the high prevalence of cardiovascular disease in people with COPD, especially if a single intervention could address both issues.
Significance of findings
NO is a vital physiological mediator in the body. It is produced in two different ways: by an endogenous pathway (oxygen-dependent) via the L-arginine NO synthase system and by an exogenous pathway (oxygen-independent) via the reduction of dietary NO3- via NO2- to NO.35 36 In the human diet, the main source of NO3- is green leafy vegetables, which have high concentrations of NO3-. NO3- reduction to NO is favoured by conditions found in exercising muscle, in particular hypoxia, acidosis and the presence of deoxyhaemoglobin and myoglobin. Effects on exercise in people with respiratory disease could be mediated through improved muscle mitochondrial efficiency or through effects on vascular endothelium in either the systemic or pulmonary circulation. Endothelial effects of NO are also likely to underpin the effects on blood pressure that were observed.
Regarding the impact of dietary NO3- supplementation on exercise capacity, the current meta-analysis includes studies in COPD, which found an improvement in exercise capacity,16–19 and others that did not.26 28–32 Studies included heterogeneous COPD populations (eg, COPD severity and age) and used different exercise protocols (eg, ISWT, 6MWD and endurance time during cycle ergometry). Furthermore, hypoxic patients who required oxygen supplementation, a patient phenotype that might be expected to benefit most given that NO2- to NO conversion is enhanced in hypoxic conditions, were typically excluded. The duration of treatment and doses of NO3- used in trials also differed. The results from trials indicate that longer-term studies in specific patient phenotypes are needed to see if NO3- supplementation can improve exercise capacity in the absence of a training stimulus. Likewise, although dietary NO3- supplementation was associated with a greater increase in walk distance during PR, it is not clear how long this benefit might be sustained for—the 8-week ON-EPIC trial19 is the longest study to date of this intervention in people with CRD.
Physiological parameters at peak exercise including VO2 did not change significantly with NO3- supplementation compared with placebo,16 26–30 32 although one study found a significant reduction in VO2 at iso-time during cycle exercise in patients with COPD.29 Again, these negative results could be due to an absence of effect or a result of using insufficient dose or duration of supplementation. A dose–response effect for reduction in VO2 during exercise has previously been described in healthy individuals.37
Dietary NO3- supplementation has been shown to reduce blood pressure in individuals who are either normotensive38 or hypertensive.39 We found an overall effect to lower systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure in the studies reviewed here. People with lung disease are at high risk of cardiovascular disease, and this includes damage to the pulmonary vascular bed, which can lead to PHT.40 There is also interesting data in individuals with idiopathic PHT, which demonstrate that a low level of plasma NO3- is associated with increased mortality risk making it a potential prognostic indicator for PHT.41 Although one study with PHT was identified by our search strategy to be small, we advise against overinterpreting it, and further studies are needed.
Plasma NO3- and NO2- levels have potential to be used as a biomarker for NO availability.42 As expected, the available evidence showed that plasma NO3- and NO2- levels increased following dietary nitrate supplementation. The FeNO has been used as a diagnostic test for asthma.43 ,44 However, studies describing the FeNO level in people with COPD are inconclusive. In this review, two studies showed that FeNO level increased following NO3- supplementation,27 28 while another study had a negative result,18 so further work is needed to clarify this. Further work is needed to establish if FeNO can be used as a biomarker to monitor compliance in therapeutic trials of NO3- supplementation or even to adjust dose in individuals.
Strengths and limitations
A variety of lessons can be learnt from this review. First, most of the trials covering the effect of dietary NO3- supplementation on exercise capacity in people with respiratory disease have focused on COPD, with only one on PHT. Most trials were short term. Second, trials involved a variety of study designs, outcome measures, clinical phenotypes (severity of the disease and of hypoxia in particular), exercise protocols and dose and duration of NO3- supplementation. Third, it will be important to define whether there are different COPD phenotypes or subpopulations that can be categorised as NO3- responders or non-responders. Fourth, in most studies, BRJ was used as the source of NO3-. It is possible that other bioactive compounds in the juice that have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties including vitamin C, carotenoids, phenolics and betalains could contribute to beneficial effects. Many but not all studies have used NO3--depleted BRJ as a control, which is ideal for identifying effects of NO3- itself but runs the risk of underestimating the effect of BRJ itself if these other components have a role. Finally, none of the trials we identified for this review evaluate the effect of dietary NO3- supplementation on exercise capacity or cardiovascular parameters in people with rarer lung diseases such as ILD and cystic fibrosis.
Dietary NO3- supplementation has potential to reduce cardiovascular risk by lowering blood pressure in people with COPD as well as improving exercise capacity, though evidence for the latter is largely in the context of PR. Importantly, further work is needed to understand whether it is the rehab setting that is giving the benefit (ie, combining supplementation with exercise) or whether it is purely due to the fact that participants were followed for a longer duration than in other non-PR studies. To date, no data exist that might support dietary NO3- supplementation for lung diseases other than COPD. The data support trials of dietary NO3- supplementation in patients with COPD to address vascular endpoints, and we would suggest that exercise capacity also be measured in such trials to see whether a ‘dual benefit’ can be elicited. Outside the context of PR, further trials are indicated to evaluate the value of dietary NO3- supplementation on exercise capacity in COPD and specifically to identify the phenotypes most likely to profit from this intervention.
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
Patient consent for publication
Contributors NSH, ASA and MIP conceived the study. ASA, AMA, SMA performed the systematic review, ASA produced the first draft of the paper to which all authors contributed. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version. NSH is the guarantor.
Funding The main author disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by a scholarship from Jazan University in Saudi Arabia.
Competing interests NSH is chair of Action on Smoking and Health and medical director of the British Lung Foundation. Other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.